DecisionRespecting

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

3366) Many Armenian Diasporas, Then and Now

Posted on 12:14 AM by Unknown

by Martin W. Lewis on February 6, 2012

Wikipedia map of the recent Armenian Diaspora Armenians have long been scattered over many countries, whether as permanent migrants or temporary sojourners. Today, only about a third of their population lives in Armenia, with the rest spread over a wide area, as can be seen on the map posted here. This pattern largely reflects the movements caused by deadly mass expulsions of the early 20th century that most scholars call the Armenian Genocide. As a result, standard
. . .
reference sources on the "Armenian Diaspora" focus on the deadly Ottoman deportations into the Levant and the subsequent dispersion of survivors to the far reaches of the world. But earlier Armenian diasporas had completely different geographies that were of great historical significance. Today only vestiges of the earlier movements remain, yet at the same time new patterns are emerging as Armenians once again leave their homeland in large numbers. The Armenian diaspora, it would seem, is always in flux.

One change over the past few decades has been the reduction of the once sizable Armenia communities in the Middle East generated by the Ottoman expulsions. Lebanon is the key locale here, still hosting some 150,000 Armenians, or about four percent of the national population. Before the Lebanese Civil War of the late 1970s and `80s, the community was substantially larger. But despite its recent decline, the Beirut community remains culturally vibrant, publishing three Armenian-language daily newspapers. Each paper is linked to a different Armenian political party, typifying the fractious and sectarian nature of Lebanese politics.

Modified Wikipedia map of the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, Circa 1200 CEHistorically speaking, the Armenians are no strangers to mass deportations and refugee crises. Robin Cohen traces the Armenian "victim diaspora" back to the actions of the East Roman Emperor Maurice, who resettled Armenians in Cyprus and Macedonia in 578 CE.* The Seljuk Turkish invasion of the Armenian homeland in the eleventh century resulted in a much larger refugee flow. Many settled in Cilicia in what is now south-central Turkey. There they built their own kingdom, which emerged as a fairly powerful state called Cilician Armenia (or Little Armenia) in the 1200s. After Cilician Armenia fell to the Mamluks of Egypt in late 1300s, the more prosperous members of the community fled to the cities and towns of Europe. Central and Eastern Europe were major destinations. Poland-Lithuania, desperate to populate its vast expanse, welcomed many. So did Hungary and the Romanian principalities. So many migrants settled in the Transylvanian city of Gherla that it became known as "Armenian-town" (Armenopolis, Armenierstadt or, in Armenian, Hayakaghak). As late as 1850, Gherla had an Armenian majority; subsequently, most of the community was assimilated into the Magyar (Hungarian) population.



Modified Wikipedia map of Armenians in Transylvania 1850But not all Armenian mass movements were "victim diaporas." When historians of the early modern period discuss the Armenian diaspora, they usually have in mind a dispersion rooted more in economic opportunity than political persecution. This Armenian "trade diaspora,



" based on long-distance exchange across nodes of ethnic kin, was vast, stretching the breadth of Eurasia. When European adventurers first reached such seemingly isolated states as Tibet and Ethiopia (Abyssinia) they found prosperous Armenian outposts. Such settlements were sometimes founded on trade in highly specific commodities. The Armenians of Tibet,



for example, dealt mainly in deer musk, a once precious substance used as a perfume fixative, incense ingredient, and medicine, and which was also thought to be an aphrodisiac.

This early modern Armenian mercantile diaspora was largely voluntary, but it did include some episodes of coercion. In 1606, Shah Abbas I of Safavid Persia forcibly deported** tens of thousands of Armenians from his empire's contested border zone with the Ottomans. The shah recognized the economic potential of the Armenians, and hoped to turn it to his own advantage. Resettled in New Julfa, a suburb of the Safavid capital of Isfahan, the Armenians were treated with toleration and encouraged to trade. Before long, the New Julfa merchants were carrying out most of Persia's vital silk trade, establishing outposts as far afield as Manila and southern China. The deep extent of the historical Armenian presence in Iran is evident in the large number of Persian loanwords in the Armenian language.



The Safavid Empire was not the only major Muslim polity to want an Armenian presence. India's Mughal emperor Akbar invited Armenian merchants to settle in Agra in the late 1500s, offering substantial inducements: "By an imperial decree, Armenian merchants were exempted from paying taxes on the merchandise imported and exported by them, and they were also allowed to move around in the areas of the Mughal empire where entry of foreigners was otherwise prohibited." Many came, and the South Asian Armenian community thrived though the 1800s.

In the twentieth century, most of the foreign outposts established by this early-modern Armenian system withered, undermined by modernizing trade and transportation practices and by the hardening of ethno-national lines. Most Asian-based Armenians again relocated, usually to the Western Hemisphere, Australia, or France. The Armenian community of India now numbers all of around 100, challenging the survival of such venerable cultural institutions as the Armenian College of Kolkata (Calcutta). A similar situation is found in Ethiopia, where the remaining Armenians struggle to support their school, church and social club. The Armenian population of Iran is more stable, numbering between 40,000 to a little more than 100,000. Still, an estimated 350,000 "Armenian Iranians" now live abroad. In the Armenian communities of Europe, partial assimilation has generated a more ambiguous situation. Poland, site of one of the oldest diasporic communities, found only 1,082 Armenian residents in its 2002 census; some Armenian sources, however, claim that the actual number is closer to 100,000.

While many foreign Armenian communities are disappearing, others are being replenished by emigration from Armenia itself. Since the late 1980s, an estimated one million Armenians have moved abroad, fleeing the poverty of their homeland. Most have relocated to Russia, long a focus of Armenian dispersal. As a result, the population of Armenia itself has dropped substantially in recent years. Demographers estimate that 25,000 to 30,000 people permanently leave the country each year. In 2010, the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) officially advised the Armenian government to "improve the socioeconomic situation and strengthen the rule of law" in order to avoid further depopulation. Considering the fact that its total fertility rate is only about 1.5, Armenia's demographic future does seem grim.

The current Armenian exodus has a distinct gender imbalance, with men predominating. In some rural areas, women now form a clear majority. As one local informant recently told a reporter, "It's a total matriarchate. We even joke that our village's name should be changed from `Canyon of Roses' to `Canyon of Women.'"



Counterbalancing this trend has been a marked upturn since independence in the sex ratio at birth;







far more Armenian boys are being born than girls. This trend is found throughout the southern Caucasus: Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan now vie with northern India and eastern China for their natal sex imbalances. The exact reasons for this seldom-noted Caucasian phenomenon are not clear, although son-preference obviously plays a major role.

* Robin Cohen, Global Diasporas: An Introduction. 1997. University of Washington Press, page 44).

** Persian sources often claim that the Armenians came on their own, fleeing persecution by the Ottoman authorities, but most historians doubt such accounts.

http://geocurrents.info/place/russia-ukraine-and-caucasus/



Further References:
Armenian emigration creates `women-only` villages
From the Newspaper | 26th September, 2011

VARDADZOR (Armenia), Sept 25: There are no men to be seen in the rural lanes of Vardzador as mother-of-four Susanna Asatrian makes her way to the fields to thresh barley and wheat.

Her husband has left the country in search of work like so many other men in remote, impoverished Armenian settlements, leaving them almost entirely populated by women to symbolise the country`s depopulation problem.

“It`s a total matriarchate. We even joke that our village`s name should be changed from `Canyon of Roses` to `Canyon of Women`,” said the 36-year-old.

In the midst of the harvest season in Vardadzor, around 130 kilometres from the ex-Soviet state`s capital Yerevan, women do the hard agricultural labour, prepare for the long winter ahead and raise their children practically without male assistance.“The children miss their father, but what can we do?” asked Asatrian.

In villages like this, women traditionally marry young and their husbands often leave after their honeymoon to work as migrant labourers, only returning for a couple of months each year.

The men who remain are largely elderly.

More than a million people left Armenia in the years from 1988 to 2007, with around two-thirds of them relocating to Russia, like Asatrian`s husband, leaving the small Caucasus republic with a current population of 3.2 million.

Asatrian is one of the lucky ones, however; her husband comes home every New Year, rings her up frequently and sends hundreds of dollars to support the family every few months.

Others fear that their husbands will find new wives in Russia and abandon them completely, as in the case of one woman from Vardadzor whose emigrant partner broke off contact while she was expecting her second baby.

“There has been no news of him for the past 10 years, not a single phone call,” said the 29-year-old who gave her name as Tamara.

“People say that he lives in Omsk with an older Russian woman, brings up her child and does not want to think about us.”

Emigration has increased again in recent months, a trend which analysts link to the economic recovery after the global financial crisis.

The United Nations Population Fund and the state statistics agency estimate that some 25,000-30,000 people abandon Armenia permanently each year.

“Those who leave the country are mainly young men in the prime of their life,” said Garik Hayrapetian of the United Nations Population Fund.

“The situation negatively affects the population`s reproduction and gender balance and contributes to the ageing of society.”

Armenia`s opposition argues that migration threatens the country`s national security, and President Serzh Sarkisian has declared that the authorities must take action.“The number of people looking for overseas success is large, and of course we should be seriously concerned about this problem,” Sarkisian said earlier this year, suggesting that the only way to reverse the trend was to create better economic conditions.

Surveys have suggested that 70-75 per cent of emigrants leave because of the lack of job opportunities and low wages in a country that suffers from economic isolation because its borders with neighbours Turkey and Azerbaijan have long been closed due to political disputes.

But the head of the country`s migration agency Gagik Eganian accused the opposition of trying to score political points by describing the latest wave of emigration as catastrophic and suggesting that Armenia was becoming “deserted”.

“There is no data on what proportion of these people (this year`s emigrants) left the country forever,” he said.

Some analysts also argue that migration has economic benefits, with many families surviving on money sent home by relatives working abroad — $772 million in the first half of this year alone.

But in a more worrying statistic, the United Nations Population Fund says that 44 per cent of people responding to one of its surveys did not see a future for themselves and their children in Armenia.

Hayrapetian also raised concerns that not only the poor and jobless were now leaving.

“Migration has changed qualitatively. Well-off people with higher education and well-paid jobs are now emigrating,” he said.

The government is preparing what it calls a National Programme for Migration Reduction, which is due to be launched soon, while another scheme entitled `Come Home` aims to encourage people from the huge Armenian diaspora to resettle in their ethnic homeland.

Back in Vardadzor, Susanna Asatrian`s children keep in contact with their father via the internet, while others wait expectantly for their dads to return from Russia for Christmas — although some of them, it seems, are likely to be disappointed.—AFP

http://dawn.com/2011/09/26/armenian-emigration-creates-women-only-villages/


UN Report Warns Of 'New Wave' Of Emigration From Armenia

The report encourages "the adoption and restoration of democratic values in governance practice and the elimination of double standards."

May 11, 2010
YEREVAN -- Armenia is being warned that it faces "a new wave of emigration" unless the government does more to improve the socioeconomic situation and strengthen the rule of law, RFE/RL's Armenian Service reports.

The warning came in a report by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) presented today.

The report -- drawn up by local migration experts -- called for wide-ranging government measures, including democratic reform, that would "considerably reduce the motivation of Armenia's population to leave the country."

At least 700,000 Armenians, or about one-quarter of the country's population, are believed to have emigrated to Russia and other countries since the break-up of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the resulting turmoil in the region.

The outflow slowed significantly in the 1990s as the Armenian economy began recovering from its post-Soviet slump.

"However, despite the aforementioned process, the external migration situation in Armenia still remains alarming," the report says. "Moreover, there are certain factors that give reason to assume that a new, rather massive wave of emigration may emerge."

The report says tens of thousands of Armenian men working abroad might eventually reunite with their families and cause Armenia to "lose another 200,000-300,000 citizens."

It says another factor that could drive emigration is the ongoing concentration of agricultural land in the hands of wealthy individuals.

The report acknowledges an economic benefit of emigration in the form of cash remittances sent home by hundreds of thousands of Armenian migrant workers mainly based in Russia, Europe, and the United States.

According to the Armenian Central Bank, those transfers totaled $1.12 billion last year -- equivalent to nearly 13 percent of the country's gross domestic product.

But it also says emigration has had a number of detrimental effects, including decreased birth and marriage rates and a brain drain.

Accordingly, the report stresses the need for "active intervention" by the state aimed at "limiting the volume of permanent emigration."

It says that should be done through improving not only economic conditions but "governance practices" in the country. More specifically, that should mean "the adoption and restoration of democratic values in governance practice and the elimination of double standards," according to the report.

"Most state officials are inclined to blame [the emigration] on socioeconomic causes such as unemployment," says Vartan Gevorgian, a sociologist who led a team of Armenian experts working on the report.

"But at the end of the day, people become poor not just because of a loss of income but also because of being unable to defend their rights...because of weak property guarantees."

Speaking during a public presentation of the report, Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Armen Gevorgian said its findings and proposals would be "useful" for government officials dealing with migration.

Gevorgian also said that the Armenian government was committed to finding "effective and radical solutions" to the problem and was currently working on a strategy of "state regulation of migration."

He did not elaborate.


http://www.rferl.org/content/UN_Report_Warns_Of_New_Wave_Of_Emigration_From_Armenia/2039164.html

.
Read More
Posted in Research PAPERS | No comments

Friday, August 17, 2012

3365) Criminally Inclined? How Come So Many Armenians from RA Turn to Crime in US?

Posted on 7:09 AM by Unknown
Edik Baghdasaryan

During my recent trip to the States, I found myself waiting in the office of an Armenian attorney in Glendale. I wanted to speak to some of his clients.

A man of about 40 entered with his wife of the same age. I had made some acquaintances with members of the Armenian Bar Association and the contacts were bearing fruit.

On the day in question, I was serving as one of their assistants.

I began to perform my duties – to listen attentively to their stories and familiarize myself with their cases. For the most part, the clients were former residents of Armenia.

I took notes and was amazed with what I heard – robbery, fraud, bank embezzlement, credit card theft...Here’s one of their tales
. . .

A woman wound up in a police entrapment scheme. Her husband had forced her into committing the crime. When the lawyer told her the prosecuting attorney was asking for a 180 jail sentence, the woman broke into tears. Sitting alongside, her husband told her “keep your mouth shut”.

The husband was wearing a thick gold chain around his thick neck. In Glendale, sporting a thick gold necklace is tantamount to saying one also drives a BMW. No matter how poor they are or in debt, all former RA residents in Los Angeles must have a BMW and thick gold chains.

Over the course of Saturday and Sunday, when the banks are closed, this family racked up $25,000 of purchase on a fake credit line of $2,000. In one store, they purchased a $1,500 computer. Three hours later they came back and bought three more. Elsewhere, they purchased a meat grinder and other household goods.

When the woman made a feeble attempt to weasel her way out, the attorney pulled out an envelope, leaned over, and showed her the photos taken on closed circuit cameras. Everything was there in black and white. The woman said nothing more and began to wail even louder.

The attorney advised them to come clean so that he could draft an appropriate defense.

The crafty pair had started out with a small purchase on their credit line. Then, with the use of a cell phone, they gave a bank account number from which to draw more funds for the credit line. It later turned out that the account had been frozen in 2010.

Since it was Friday evening and the banks were closed, the fraud was only discovered a few days later.

The attorney asked what they had done with all those computers and the couple, in tandem, said they had sent them as gifts to Armenia. He then asked who had used the fake bank account and credit line. The woman said nothing and looked at her husband.

The husband, hands placed on the table, was trying to convey the fact that he had done the dirty deeds but, in reality, he had made her an accomplice.

“I have no idea where the money came from. Whoever did it should come forward and say so,” said the play acting husband. He then told his wife to leave the room.

The attorney raised his voice a bit and told the man he shouldn’t have ordered his wife to leave.

“Brother, you committed the thefts by purchasing those items. It was your credit card and you knew about the $2,000 limit. They have all the photos. If you have the money, you’d better pay them back,” the attorney advised.

The man responded that they didn’t have that amount of money. The attorney advised him to pay at least a portion to avoid a jail sentence. The man said he’d go and think about it.

I have no idea how the case will end. Go to Los Angeles and you can hear countless similar tales on a daily basis.

Mark Bledstein, a local attorney who has served Armenian clients for many years says the following about Armenians charged with various crimes.

“For many just coming from Armenia, it’s not a crime to cheat the government. At least this was the general perception of the first wave of immigrants. This country is awash in money and they think they can steal some of it. The second generation has changed a bit. The third generation will have become Americans and won’t think like that at all.”

I decided to sit in at some of the trials. The first was at the court in Burbank. I looked at the trial schedules affixed to the wall. I spotted three Armenian names involved in criminal and six names for civil trials.

(To be continued)

Photo: Burbank Courthouse



Comments
karen 30 July, 2012
Yeghkeli is. Now I like them to stay in or go?

Levik 30 July, 2012
These criminals are not citizens of the Republic of Armenia and other former big difference there ....

haykUS 30 July, 2012
Edik jan, please continue your stories from LA. More I see them more I believe that LA has quite different Armenian community than in other US cities and majority in LA think ounly how to make money illegaly instead of being good citizens.


Artur 30 July, 2012
I am from LA and been here since 1990. Sure some Armenians do bad stuff here but that's a small portion. Most of us are hard working people who love our families and our neighbors. Sad that the bad ones are making the rest of us look bad. Few bad apples are spoiling the rest...

A Resident 30 July, 2012
"...all former RA residents in Los Angeles must have a BMW and thick gold chains." - this is probably the most ignorant statement I have read or heard in a long while. Statements like this take away from the overall credibility of the author. Very unfortunate

BMW 4-ever 31 July, 2012
I'm 50 years old, originally from Yerevan, lived in SoCal for over 3 decades. I'd never broken any laws, (except a pair of traffic violation), never was arrested, and never have been in the courthouse (except for Jury Duty). I do drive BMW -- have owned 5 so far, enjoy the fruits of my hard labor, and don't wear a goldchain on my neck. The kicker is, I'm not an exception -- I believe I'm the norm, yet nobody cares to write about people like me. The news is sensentiolized thanks to the people who ARE criminals, and WILL be criminals regardless of their country of residency. Get over it -- Armenians are wondeful in infinite ways, and as with any nationality, criminal elements at times are unavoidable .

Jack Muradyan 31 July, 2012
There are some ignorant comments in this article and it looks like it was written by a high school student. How can you generize like this? You think everyone is like this? Because of some low lifes you think most people out of Armenia are like this? While I cannot defend these people, but trust me. Majority of Armenians from Armenia are smart hardworking people. I'm surprised an Armenian would write such an ignorant article.

Mikemur 31 July, 2012
It's not the criminals I'm woried about, because sooner or later they will be caught and put in jail. It's people who use them to make hatefull comments against an entire group that warry me. There are no low against them. The damage they create by dividing and sprading hate among poeple are much bigger then the crimes of these common criminals. It is not a coinsident that our enemies have used same wepons of demonizations and division against us many times before. Other nations are more aware of this danger and you rarly see one of them blaming their own entire group for crimes of a few.

Tom 31 July, 2012
Maybe the author is generalizing when describing ALL former RA citizens as gold chain wearing, BMW driving hustlers and cheats, but to be fair, whenever you read about Armenians involved in crime, organized or petty, THE MAJORITY COME FROM ARMENIA. This has probably more to do with Armenia's post-Soviet reality than any genetic disposition to crime. Parallels can be made to Soviet Jews cheating the system and engaging in criminal rackets in Brooklyn and elsewhere. The RA Ministry of the Diaspora should be funding research on this aspect of its own diaspora rather than believing it can analyze the traditional diaspora that has precious little connection to present day Armenia.

Christopher 31 July, 2012
If only Armenians used their brilliant minds at doing better things rather then stealing from the US government and acting so proud of their actions. A smart race of people who will never know where to use their intelligence.

Raffi 31 July, 2012
Try as I might, I have been unable to unearth official stats or facts as to the perventage of "ethnic" Armenians in the total prison population of the California State Prison Sytem, let alone county jails. Nor are there reports detailing the numbers of Armenians arrested and incarcerated on an annual basis in California. So let's not jump to conclusions that Armenians are more or less inclined to committ criminal offences than other "ethnic groups" in California or indeed elsewhere. If readers have such information, please share it with the rest of us. Anecdotal assumptions and here-say are no basis for claiming that Armenians, in relation to their population, engage in criminal activities than others. Let's get the facts on the table if possible..

Marianna 31 July, 2012
Karen, just like them All - Armenian and Armenia are the result of the general mentality, it will be much more preferable, and does not turn to other countries that remain in their normal, industrious and law-abiding compatriots discredited the name and the Armenians (and in general all the post-Soviet mentality, which is broken logic state (part of which, according to them, the banks are) stealing is stealing, and other tactics) do not become criminals in America, Mr. Baghdasaryan, but use different system in the U.S., people trust feature, which is already complete will disappear very soon due to their nmanneri and painful that such an experienced journalist like you to be irresponsible generalization to several hundred thousand Armenians havasaratsnelov several thousand aimless anugheghnerin.

Gary 1 August, 2012
All US major papers and media outlets have stories about Haiastanzis committing all kinds of criminal acts. It is not a small number and no one has an agenda to make us look bad. This is a consequence of Soviet Armenia mentality: still if you can,why not? specially the government. Utter and total selfishness. It is a moral bankruptcy for a nation who yells their are the 1st Christians.

Lag 2 August, 2012
Driving a BMW in Glendale is not expensive: you can lease one for around $6,000 per year. Of course you will not be the owner of the BMW, but people will think that you are. And that's all that matters for most Armenians driving such cars.

Aram 3 August, 2012
One of the reasons that Hayastatsis have had a bad reputation in U.S is that a lot of uneducated and shady characters came along the educated and decent ones while most Armenians from around the world that came to U.S were educated and did not need or got involved with shady affairs.

Armen 3 August, 2012
I am an Armenian from Armenia who has been educated in the US through highly prestigious US government fellowship program. Now I reside in Armenia and work and live for Artsakh. I have seen crooks in both Armenia and the US. Cheating and stealing does not have nationality. I was so honest that I was called "a man descending from the starts" back in my home city. I strongly disagree with the gist and logic of the article that Armenians cheat and lie, especially those coming from Armenia. Search honest people in today's Armenia and Artsakh and you will find tens of thousands pearls and diamonds.

Mher 3 August, 2012
This is to Aram #22. And would you say that the thousands who fled to America prior to and after the 1915 Genocide were "educated"? They were average folk from the interior provinces and towns of the Ottoman Empire who lived by certain principles of honesty and integrity. Those values seem lost today!

http://hetq.am/
July 30, 2012
.
Read More
Posted in Innocent(?) Armenians | No comments

Sunday, August 5, 2012

3364) Infuence of Ethnic Lobbying on US Foreign Policy

Posted on 11:26 PM by Unknown
© This content Mirrored From TurkishArmenians  Site armenians-1915.blogspot.com by Rafiga Gurbanzade,
4 August 2012

Lobbying is generally defined as the process of seeking to influence a government and its institutions to execute policies that serve interests of a group of individuals. The Woodstock Theological Center defines lobbying as a “deliberate attempt to influence political decision through various forms of advocacy directed at policymakers on behalf of another person, organization or group” (58). The earliest instances of lobbying date back to ancient Greece and Rome, where lobbyists sought to influence senators and plebs for or against specific issues (Zetter, 6). Special interests protected by lobbying may vary from businesses and politicians to foreign governments and ethnic groups. Ethnic lobbying may advocate interests of a distinct group in the host country or may seek to influence foreign policy of the host country towards the country of origin or third countries.
. . .

In the United States, the roots of ethnicity-based competition for political influence date back to the early 20th century. By 1965, the elimination of criteria for domination of any one ethnic group in the U.S. immigration legislation paradoxically added political strength to ethnic advocacy groups (Jacobson, 66). Currently, ethnic interest groups spend millions of dollars annually to influence U.S. foreign policy and to “block the influence of rival ethnic lobbies” (Ambrosio, 207). Driven by ethno-cultural differences, foreign conflicts and antagonistic interests of the rival parties, ethnic lobbies manage to mobilize strength of their constituent communities and to profoundly impact the U.S. legislative and executive decision-making processes.

The ways of influencing U.S. foreign policy can be classified into two distinct, yet highly interconnected, categories. The first category involves, mobilization and maintenance of grassroots lobbying by way of diaspora, that is, the American citizens of a distinct ethnic descent. The second category is a direct foreign government intervention through registered lobbyists regulated by the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) of 1938. According to Samuel Huntington, both categories equally promote “interests of people outside the United States.” Huntington also noted that serious problems could arise when “the cultural communities transform into diasporas and take control over at least one state” (Pachon, 4). Claiming certain liberties under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, some concentrated grassroots organizations or lobbyists of a “vocal minority” manage to bypass the national interest and to distort legislation or policymaking on the scale of the national impact (Schultz, 437).

One of the main objectives of ethnic lobbyists is to obtain U.S. support for the country of ethnicity’s origin over their rivals, notwithstanding the lack of the U.S. national interests in the region. Currently, around one hundred foreign governments depend on lobbyists for promoting their policies in the U.S. (Newhouse). Moreover, the number of interest group communities significantly increased in recent years. As stated in the Encyclopedia of Associations, in 2010 there were 24,000 registered organizations in the U.S., constituting a 64 per cent growth of lobbyist groups since 1980 (Smith, Roberts & Wielen Ryan, 352). According to the Foreign Affairs magazine among the strongest lobbies in the U.S. are those advocating the interests of Armenia, China, Greece, India, Ireland, Israel, Taiwan, and Ukraine. Moreover, one of the many downsides of the lobby penetration in the U.S. legislature is that “the subculture of law firms that [assist in these works] reflects a steady decline and privatization of diplomacy – with an increasing impact on how the United States conducts its own foreign policy” (Newhouse).

Ethnic lobbying is considered to be an effective way of influencing U.S. foreign aid and defense policy decisions. As ethics of ethnic lobbying has become a subject of public criticism and scholarly debates, majority of studies focused on the Jewish-American lobbying groups that pioneered ethnic lobbying. The consensus among scholars is generally divided into those who speak of the triumph of Jewish-American lobbying in formulating U.S. policy towards Israel and those who speak of the failure of Jewish lobbying due to the lack of control over the executive branch (Thomas, 230).

Among the various Jewish-American lobbying groups, the most known one is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). AIPAC’s major achievement is the securing of a substantial U.S. economic and military assistance to Israel. For the past decade, Israel has been the largest per capita U.S. aid recipient (Ripley & Lindsay, 93-94). As stated in the Congressional Research Service, U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel, starting from 2007, the U.S. expanded the military aid by $150 million each year (Sharp). According to the Amendment to H.R. 4310, section 12, it is in the U.S. interest and it is the sense of Congress that the U.S. “provides Israel such support as to increase development of joint missile defense systems that defend the urgent threat posed to Israel and United States forces in the region”.

The two other powerful ethnic lobbies in the U.S. are those of Greek- and Armenian-Americans. Both groups seek to influence U.S. foreign policy in support of Greece and Armenia, respectively, and are united by their antagonistic agenda against the rival Turkey. Just over the last year, the two lobbies managed to introduce 10 Congressional resolutions critical of Turkey in one way or another. During the 2011 hearings on House Resolution 306 that accused Turkey of religious discrimination, Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) expressed his frustration that, while Turkey had a better record of religious tolerance than most majority-Muslim countries, his fellow lawmakers were exercising a “terrible double standard” by singling out Turkey to please constituents of Greek and Armenian heritage (AFP).

Greek-Americans established their first lobbying group, American Hellenic Institute (AHI), in 1974. The formation of AHI and the mobilization of Greek-Americans, who currently number an estimated 1.5 million nationwide, were inspired by the Greek-Turkish standoff over Cyprus (Cameron, 90). Driven by the anti-Turkish policy agenda, AHI successfully convinced Congress to place an arms embargo against Turkey from 1975 to 1978, in violation of the Foreign Military Sales Act. In addition, being actively involved in congressional committees and obtaining support from grassroots groups, AHI successfully secured military aid to Greece by 70 per cent higher than to Turkey, and cancelled economic aid to Turkey in 1995, thus impeding the U.S.–Turkish trade in the northern sector of Cyprus (Cameron, 90; McCormick). By 2001, the number of AHI members accumulated up to 25,000 with 20,000 additional members functioning in an auxiliary organization (Cameron, 90). Greek-American lobby also supports Greece’s ongoing obstruction to Macedonia’s NATO admission over the naming dispute. The obstruction is despite the fact that Macedonia provided critical support and has been a key staging ground to U.S. and NATO operations in former Yugoslavia.

Armenian-American lobby in the U.S. builds upon a sizeable community that numbers over half a million in California alone. The largest grassroots organization, Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA), is a U. S. affiliate of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF), a left-wing nationalist party that dominated Armenian politics since 1890 (CREW). The other Armenian-American lobbying group is the Armenian Assembly of America (AAA). Like the Jewish-American special interest, ANCA and AAA secured U.S. economic assistance to Armenia, making it the second largest per capita recipient of U.S. aid after Israel (Mainville). The total amount of U.S. assistance to Armenia since 1992 topped $2 billion (Nichol).

Apart from aid issues, both ANCA and AAA focus efforts around a strong anti-Turkish and anti-Azerbaijani agenda, such as the blocking of U.S. financial and military aid to Turkey and Azerbaijan, pressing resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan in favor of the former, and seeking legislative recognition of the alleged Armenian genocide (Cameron, 91). In 2010-11, under pressure from ANCA and facing reelection, Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Robert Menendez (D-NJ) effectively blocked the nomination of Matthew Bryza, a career U.S. diplomat, as the Ambassador to Azerbaijan. ANCA representatives did not hide their concern over the ethnic Turkish background of Bryza’s wife (De Waal). Even after the recess appointment by President Obama and a year of service, Bryza’s confirmation met obstruction from Senator Menendez, effectively ending the diplomat’s career.

ANCA advocates were also successful in securing full U.S. economic and political support for Armenia amidst its ongoing occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding seven regions of Azerbaijan since the early 1990s (CIA). While the United Nations Security Council adopted 4 resolutions calling for immediate and unconditional withdrawal of Armenian forces in 1993, Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.) authored Section 907 of Freedom Support Act, which prohibited any U.S. aid to Azerbaijani government until it “ceases the illegal blockades of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh” (Ambrosio, 156).

One of the factors by which the Armenian-American lobby’s agenda contradicts U.S. strategic interests is that, while Turkey is a NATO member and Azerbaijan is a more attractive economic and strategic partner (Ambrosio, 207), Armenia hosts the only remaining Russian military base in the South Caucasus and maintains close cooperation with Iran (Lucas). According to Wikileaks, in 2008 Armenian government supplied Iran with rockets and machine guns that were later used to kill at least one U.S. serviceman in Iraq (Lake).

The strength of the Armenian and Greek interest groups is the result of the weakness of the Turkish and Azerbaijani lobbies in the past (Ambrosio, 153). As noted in the Turkey at the Crossroads: Ottoman Legacies and Great Middle East, “Turkey has historically met the joint opposition of the powerful Armenian- and Greek- American lobbies, and suffered from the absence of an effective pro-Turkish lobby”(Jung & Piccoli, 169). In recent years, Turkey and Turkish-Americans, who number over half a million, have intensified efforts to counter the two opposing lobbies using similar techniques. As stated in the Turkish Coalition of America (TCA) reports, in 2012, the Congressional Turkish Caucus has grown to more than 150 lawmakers, already surpassing the Armenian Caucus. Additionally, according to the Turk of America Magazine, Turkish-Americans have joined the top contributors to political causes on the Hill over the last years.

Historically, the U.S. has been rich in variety of ethnic groups, cultures, religions and backgrounds. The challenge to the U.S. is not caused by the abounding and diverse fabric of its nation, but by the individual interest groups that serve political causes other than those of in the interests of America. As stated by the former Secretary of Defense, James Schlesinger in 2001, “the United States has less of a foreign policy in a traditional sense of a great power than we have the stapling together of a series of goals put forth by domestic constituency groups” (Albert, 41). Consequently, as result of ethnic lobbying, U.S. foreign policy loses its cohesiveness, weakening America’s position as a global leader.


References

Ambrosio, Thomas. Ethnic Identity Groups and U.S. Foreign Policy. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002. Print.

Ambrosio, Thomas. Irredentism: Ethnic Conflict and International Politics. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2001. Print.

“Azerbaijan.” The Central Intelligence Agency. 10 Jul. 2012. Web. 18 Jul. 2012. .

“Congressional Caucus on U.S.-Turkey Relation and Turkish Americans Reaches 150 Members.” Turk of America. 28 Jun. 2012. Web. 18 Jul. 2012. .

De Waal, Thomas. “Insejm in the Senate.” The National Interest. 19 Oct. 2012. Web. 18 Jul. 2012. .

“CREW Files Complaint Against Armenian National Committee of America – Western Region.” Citizenship for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. 18 Feb. 2009. Web. 23 Jul. 2012. .

Jacobson, David. Rights across Borders: Immigration and the Decline of Citizenship. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1996. Print.

Jung, Dietrich, and Wolfango Piccoli. Turkey at the Crossroads: Ottoman Legacies and a Greater Middle East. London: Zed, 2001. Print.

Lake, Eli. “WikiLeaks: Armenia sent Iran arms used to kill U.S. troops.” The
Washington Times. 29 Nov. 2010. Web. 18 Jul. 2012. .

Lucas, Edward. The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. Print.

Mainville, Michael. “Second-Largest Recipients of U.S. Aid, Armenians Fight To Get Ahead.” The Sun. 9 Aug. 2005. Web. 18 Jul. 2012. .

Nichol, Jim. “Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: Political Developments and
Implications for U.S. Interests.” Congressional Research Service. 15 Jun. 2012. Web. 18 Jul. 2012. .

“Organizing in Politics.” Turkish Coalition of America. Web. 18 Jul. 2012.
.

Pachon, Harry. Latinos and U.S. Foreign Policy: Representing the "homeland"? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000. Print.

Ripley, Randall B., and James M. Lindsay. Congress Resurgent: Foreign and Defense Policy on Capitol Hill. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1993. Print.

Sharp, Jeremy M. “U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel.” Congressional Research Service. 12 Mar. 2012. Web. 18 Jul. 2012. .

Smith, Steven S., Jason M. Roberts, and Wielen Ryan J. Vander. The American Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. Print.

Schultz, David A. Encyclopedia of the United States Constitution. New York, NY: Facts On File, 2009. Print.

The Ethics of Lobbying: Organized Interests, Political Power, and the Common Good. The Woodstock Theological Center. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown UP, 2002. Print. Web. Jul. 18. 2012.

The Role of American Political Culture in the Development of the U.S.-Israel "Special Relationship" and the Lost Opportunities for Achieving Middle East Peace. Austin: University of Texas, 2007. Print.

Thomas, Clive S. Research Guide to U.S. and International Interest Groups. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2004. Print.

“Turkish and Turkic American Grassroots Organizations
Express Concern on Racist Regime of Legislation.” Assembly of Turkish American Association. 25 Jun. 2012. Web. 18 Jul. 2012. .

United States. Cong. Senate. 112th Congress, 1st Session. S. 608, To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress, and for other purpose [introduced in the U.S. Senate; 25 January 2011]. 112th Cong., 1st sess. Congressional Bills, GPO Access. Web. 18 July 2012. .

“US panel presses Turkey on religious rights.” Association of Fundraising Professionals. 20 Jun. 2012. Web. 18 Jul. 2012.

Zetter, Lionel. Lobbying: The Art of Political Persuasion. Petersfield, Hampshire: Harriman House, 2008. Print.

*Rafiga Gurbanzade is a student at the Department of Criminology, Law & Society University of California, Irvine



Journal of Turkish Weekly
http://www.turkishweekly.net


.
Read More
Posted in Lobbying | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
View mobile version
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • 3155) FBI Busts Armenian Mafia For The Largest US Medicare Fraud, Identity Theft & Bank Fraud
    March 26, 2012 Update Armenian Power Organized Crime Group Convicted For One Of The Largest Identity Theft And Bank Fraud Schemes Armenian...
  • 3254) Some Armenian Nationalists Still Eager To Kill Turks |ASALA Threatens Turkish Embassies In The Year 2011 | Largest Armenian Terror Dossier Ever
    Some Armenian nationalists still eager to kill Turks by Gareth Jenkins 26 April 2011 News.Az interviews Gareth Jenkins, non-resident T...
  • 2925) Opinions: Kassesian, Sassounian, Aramyan, Novosti, Aramyan, Jabarian, Badalyan, Eckian, Bayramoglu, Toranian, Gürsel . .
    Young Turks: Who Were The Authors of Our Genocide?, Ioasif Kassesian , From His book: Nemesis Are Armenia’s Policies Making Turkey Stron...
  • 3030) SlideShow: Armenian Legion In Nazi Germany
    Related Link: Nazi-Armenians Helped Hitler Exterminate Jews . . 12 Images Kindly Provided by TruckT...
  • 3197) Video: Jewish Role in the "Armenian Genocide"
    What hand did the Jews play in what is called the Armenian Genocide? If you think the answer has anything to do with the ridiculous and ant...
  • 3189) An 81-Year Old Chevalier: Şükrü Server Aya: A One-man Army Wrestling Armenian Fanatics
    Summary Of New Book Release Meeting At Turksam For The Genocide Of Truth Continues Authored By Sükrü Server Aya An 81-Year Old Chevalier ...
  • 2942) Media Scanner Aug 2009 (162 Items)
    Genocide and International Law to be Topic of Beirut Conference , Haigazian University in Beirut Armenian-Turkish Cooperation: The Traffick...
  • 3348) ASALA: We All Believed In One Idea: Party
    ASALA: We All Believed In One Idea: Party Interview with "The interlocutor of Armenia," Commander Group "Yeghia Keshishian...
  • 3367) Armenian Assassin Hampig Sassounian's Parole Pushed
    Other Hampig Sassounian Related Posts at This Site: Hampig Sassounian: An Archetypal Example of Contemporary Armenian Terrorism Remembe...
  • 3251) Remembering The Orly Attack
    19 April 2011 Updated: 6 May 2011 By Maxime Gauin* ABSTRACT The bombing of the Orly airport, on July 15, 1983, one the two most bloody attac...

Categories

  • 1 (19)
  • Adolf HITLER (2)
  • Alfred De Zayas (3)
  • Ambassador Morgenthau (3)
  • ANCA (4)
  • Andranik Pasha (1)
  • Andrew Mango (3)
  • Ara BALIOZIAN (12)
  • Ara Papian (7)
  • Ara SARAFIAN (2)
  • Aram Andonian (1)
  • ARF (21)
  • Armen GARO (6)
  • Armenian TERROR (24)
  • Arthur Sutherland (4)
  • ASALA (5)
  • Ata ATUN (1)
  • AUSTRALIA (6)
  • Berch Keresteciyan (1)
  • Boghos Nubar Pasha (1)
  • Book REVIEW (21)
  • C F Dixon-Johnson (1)
  • CANADA (1)
  • Captain Emory Niles (3)
  • Court Cases (10)
  • David Holthouse (2)
  • David Saltzman (5)
  • Dennis R PAPAZIAN (1)
  • Dogu Ergil (1)
  • Edward ERICKSON (4)
  • Erciyes University (1)
  • Ergun KIRLIKOVALI (17)
  • Erman SAHIN (1)
  • France (5)
  • Free E-Books (54)
  • Free E-Books And Docs (2)
  • Fridthjof Nansen (1)
  • Fuat Dundar (5)
  • General Harbord (1)
  • Guenter LEWY (2)
  • Gunay Evinch (4)
  • Gwynne DYER (1)
  • Hampig Sassounian (8)
  • Harut SASSOUNIAN (32)
  • Henry Morgenthau (1)
  • Hetq.am (28)
  • Holdwater (2)
  • Hrant DINK (5)
  • Innocent(?) Armenians (24)
  • James Bryce (2)
  • Jeremy Salt (6)
  • Justin McCarthy (11)
  • Kamer KASIM (1)
  • Karabakh (1)
  • Kemal Cicek (2)
  • Khatchig Mouradian (11)
  • Khojaly (1)
  • League of Nations (13)
  • Limited Book Preview (2)
  • Lobbying (1)
  • Louise NALBANDIAN (2)
  • Maxime GAUIN (31)
  • Media SCANNER (4)
  • Mehmet PERINCEK (1)
  • Michael GUNTER (5)
  • Mumtaz SOYSAL (2)
  • Murad Topalian (4)
  • Noam Chomsky (1)
  • Norman STONE (3)
  • O E LUTEM (6)
  • Pasdermadjian (1)
  • Peter Balakian (2)
  • Pierre Loti (2)
  • Rafael De Nogales (1)
  • Research PAPERS (76)
  • Robert Fisk (8)
  • Ruben Safrastyan (1)
  • S (41)
  • Sadi DINLENC (2)
  • Sedat LACINER (1)
  • SlideShows (5)
  • Southern Poverty Law Center (2)
  • Sukru AYA (150)
  • Taner AKCAM (11)
  • Turkkkaya ATAOV (4)
  • Vahakn DADRIAN (1)
  • Vahe AVETIAN (4)
  • Vercihan Zifliyan (3)
  • Videos (43)
  • William Saroyan (2)
  • Woodrow Wilson (2)
  • Yucel GUCLU (2)
  • Yuksel OKTAY (1)
  • Yusuf Halacoglu (1)
  • Zoryan Institute (4)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (29)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ▼  2012 (49)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ▼  August (3)
      • 3366) Many Armenian Diasporas, Then and Now
      • 3365) Criminally Inclined? How Come So Many Armen...
      • 3364) Infuence of Ethnic Lobbying on US Foreign Po...
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (139)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2010 (208)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (32)
    • ►  April (28)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2009 (75)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (23)
    • ►  August (27)
    • ►  July (3)
Powered by Blogger.