DecisionRespecting

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, May 12, 2013

3400) A History of a Perfect Crime By Talin Suciyan

Posted on 8:15 AM by Unknown
 

 Samatya (Raymond Kevorkian, Ermeniler, Aras Publ., 2012) . . .

May 12, 2013
The Armenian Weekly April 2013 Magazine

I spent my high school years in Samatya. The majority of my classmates were the children of the Armenians who had come to Istanbul from the provinces during the republican years. We were allowed to go out during our lunch breaks. Many of the students lived in Samatya and could go home for lunch. Yet, in the early 1990’s, when the political tension in the country reached its peak, because of the Kurdish issue, we were no longer allowed to go outside the school grounds during lunch breaks. . .

Although we used to work hard to not only be good citizens but the “best citizens”—we took compulsory national security classes taught by a high-ranking military officer, and would do our military exercises in the schoolyard so loud that half the district would hear our voices—it never guaranteed our security.

In those years, constant bomb warnings were proof of our insecurity. After each warning, we would go out to the schoolyard until the entire school was searched. Sometimes we would be asked to go home early. We hardly had any idea why a bomb would be planted in our school. No one would put these bomb warnings into context. There was nothing to understand; it was just like that. And so we got used to these warnings, along with the changing security measures that were an ordinary part of our school life.

During my doctoral research, I read Armenian newspapers from the 1930’s and had the chance to look at Samatya from a different perspective. Samatya was one of the districts where kaghtagayans were established. Kaghtagayans were kaghtagan (deportee or IDP) centers that hosted thousands of Armenians from the provinces. These centers functioned until the end of the 1930’s. Armenian newspapers published in Istanbul in the 1920’s and 1930’s were full of reports on the kaghtagans’ severe conditions in these centers, where they often had to live on top of one another. The community in Istanbul was responsible for providing food, work, and a sustainable life for these people. Yet, it was not easy, as the financial means of the community were shortened to a great extent, the court cases for saving its properties continued, and its legal status was in the process of complete eradication. And still, Armenians whose living conditions in the provinces were systematically decimated continued to come to Istanbul.

Armenians who remained in the provinces were threatened in several ways. Arshag Alboyaciyan referred to these attacks in his book Badmut‘iwn Malatio Hayots’:

In 1924, Armenians were leaving en masse since a group of attackers—15 people—were raiding their houses asking for money and jewels, beating them up, almost to death. This organization was called Ateshoglu Yildirim… They would put signs on the houses of Armenians and tell them to leave within 10 days… One day, they put a sign on the main church, giving Armenians five days to leave; otherwise, they said, ‘Ateshoglu Yildirim would burn you all.’2

Armenians understood that the organization was trying to intimidate them into leaving in order to take over their properties, along with the other Emval-i Metruke (Abandoned Properties).3 In November 1923, two prominent Armenians, on behalf of 35 Armenians from Malatya, sent a letter to Mustafa Kemal, asking for security and the right to live in their houses. They wrote that if their citizenship was not recognized and they were required to leave, that this should be told to them officially, and not by raiding their houses.4 The letter did not have a positive impact; on the contrary, the signatories were asked to leave the country, and the 35 families had to follow them.5 Over the following months, Armenians continued to leave Malatya to Syria or to Istanbul.

I first came across the Ateshoglu Yildirim cases through an oral history project I conducted for my doctoral research. My interviewee said there were others in Istanbul who could talk about this organization and its raids. He contacted one family, they said yes, but then changed their minds. It was during the same time that Maritsa Küçük, an elderly Armenian women, was brutally killed, two others were severely beaten, and another attacked in Samatya. The atmosphere of fear was once again at its peak for the Armenians, and I decided to stall my research on the topic.

Yozgat, Amasya, Sinop, Ordu, Tokat, Kayseri, Diyarbak?r, Sivas . . .And so it continued—Armenians were systematically forced out of Asia Minor and northern Mesopotamia throughout the republican years. They were essentially forced to come to Istanbul, looking for shelter, food, work, and a secure life, following the Settlement Law of 1934; sometimes through extraordinary decrees ordering them to leave a certain place and be settled in another; through racist attacks that occurred on a daily basis; or simply through the state’s refusal to open Armenian schools in the provinces, which was one of the “guaranteed rights” of the Lausanne Treaty of 1923.

Armenians who came to Istanbul remained at the bottom of all hierarchies. They were caught helpless between the institutional power structures of the Armenian community in Istanbul and the state. The latter cared about them the least. These centers were closed at the end of the 1930’s; yet, Armenians continued to come to Istanbul from the provinces throughout the republican era, and their socio-economic problems occupied the agenda of the community for quite some time.

An Armenian suspect was recently arrested for the murder of Maritsa Küçük and for the other attacks on elderly women in Samatya. On the same day, the Turkish media covered the arrest with a news item, disseminated by the police,6 implying that since the suspect was Armenian, no racism was involved. Hence, the issue has been resolved.

We know that law has little to do with truth or justice. On the contrary, the mechanisms of law create substitutes for truth or justice. The cases of P?nar Selek, Hrant Dink, Sevag Bal?kç?, along with the murder of Maritsa Küçük and the other attacks in Samatya, remind us of not only the impossibility of justice, but also the perfection of a crime, which continues to silence the witnesses.7

ENDNOTES

1. This article is a revised and expanded version of Malatya, Yozgat, Ordu ve Samatya,” published in Radikal I.ki, March 2, 2013.

2. Arshag Alboyaciyan, Badmutiwn Malatio Hayots‘ (Beirut: Dbaran Sevan, 1961), pp. 966–967.

3. For Emval-? Metruke See Nevzat Onaran, Emval-? Metruke: Osmanl?’da ve Cumhuriyette Ermeni ve Rum Mallar?n?n Türles,tirilmesi (Istanbul: Belge Yay, 2010), Ug(ur Ümit Üngör, Confiscation and Destruction: The Young Turk Seizure of Armenian Property (Continuum Publ., 2011), Taner Akçam and Ümit Kurt, Kanunlar?n Ruhu (Istanbul:I.letis,im Publ., 2012).

4. Alboyaciyan, Badmut‘iwn Malatio Hayots‘, p. 967.

5. Ibid.

6. See the press release of the Istanbul branch of the Human Rights Organization of Nov. 3, 2013, after meeting Murat Nazaryan.

7. See Jean-Françis Lyotard, The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. transl. Georges van den Abbeele (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988), p. 14.


Direct Link For The pdf Version

Source


I would have expected the young journalist Talin Suciyan, (also a well known human rights activist) to be more flexible and compassionate in her observations, rather than singling out only the “humans of Armenian ethnicity” inside the mixture of Turkish nationality, which embraces too many ethnicities. Complaining only about “those of Armenian origin” from the standpoint of human rights, is nothing more than “discrimination” of an ethnicity or race, whereas our DNA’s show that we are no different than each other. Hrant Dink was not a separatist, but he did the error of “messing up clean and dirty bloods of Armenians and Turks” (instead of the Rh’s which makes transfusions work fine) and it only took some fanatic freak to find an excuse to kill him and become an hero, which was protested by “hundreds of thousands of Turks marching on streets protesting this murder”. Did ever any Armenian protest of any murder of Turks? This demonstration alone was enough evidence that normal people have no discrimination for all other ethnicities which live in this part of the world under one flag. I will write my counter comments between lines, as I usually do. S.S. Aya Continued:




Direct Link To The Document

.
Read More
Posted in Sukru AYA | No comments

Thursday, May 2, 2013

3399) Armenian Population in Eastern Anatolia 1878-1915

Posted on 7:47 AM by Unknown

Armenian Population in Eastern Anatolia between Years 1878-1915
by Prof Dr Ata ATUN

Abstract

Most of the Armenian allegations on the Armenian relocation in the year 1915 based on the Armenian Patriarch's reports and the book titled “Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story” written by Mr. Henry Morgenthau Sr..

Mr. Morgenthau was the U.S. Ambassador in Istanbul from 1913 to 1916, his book on which the Armenian allegations mainly based on, when cross checked day by day with his diary, reveals the fact that it is tailored rather than conveying the real truth on what happened during this era.

The population and events recorded by various officials, organizations, Armenian Church ecclesiastics and local governments before Armenian relocation on 1915 and after the World War I, reveals the fact that the loss of lives during relocation is far below than the alleged fictitious number.

This paper, going through various non Ottoman documents, tries to reach to actual population before and after the relocation with the intention to figure out the number of loss of lives during this incident.

Keywords: Armenian relocation, 1915, Armenian population, Hearings in USA House of Representative, Deportation,
. . .

Introduction

The Armenian population in eastern Anatolia just before the relocation, according to non Ottoman records, contradicts with the Armenian allegation of 2.5 million, which forms the basis of lives lost during the deportation in 1915.

The Armenian allegations based on mainly to the declarations of Patriarch Nerses Varjabedian on 1878, Patriarch Hovannes Arsaruni’s estimation through Mr. Kirkor Zohrab on 1912 and to book “Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story” written by Ambassador Henry Morgenthau on 1918 where a serious research revelaed later that the ghostwriter Morgenthau was Burton J. Hendrick. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences April 2013, Vol. 3, No. 4 ISSN: 2222-6990

Patriarch Nerses Varjabedian had forwarded statistics bearing large figures, as over 2.5 million on 1878 to Berlin Conference as the Armenian population living in eastern Anatolia.

The Armenian Patriarch Hovannes Arsaruni 1 (1912-13) estimated the Armenian population as over 2.1 million on 1912.

Both figures are not based on the birth or baptize or death records of the Patriarchate or to any kind of official register but purposely puffed up to demand autonomy from the Sublime Port of Ottoman Empire.


Prof. Dr. Ata ATUN
Near East University, Lefkoşa, T. R. North Cyprus
ata dot atun at atun dot com


Continued at:





Direct Link:
Armenian Population in Eastern Anatolia 1878-1915 by Ata Atun

.
Read More
Posted in Ata ATUN, Research PAPERS | No comments

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

3398) It's Time For Turkey To Recognise Historical Fact Of Armenian Genocide

Posted on 11:30 PM by Unknown


It is now 98 years since 1.5m Armenians were systematically massacred.

By Benjamin Abtan, 20 April 2013

Recognising what happened is the only way to help us all move forward.

It is now 98 years since 1.5m Armenians were systematically massacred. Recognising what happened is the only way to help us all move forward.

It has been 98 years since - following a premeditated plan with a methodic implementation - one million and a half Armenians were massacred in the Ottoman Empire. The Armenian people were the victims of a genocide which would soon serve as a gruesome reference for those that followed.
. . .

Today in Turkey, the mere enunciation of this historical fact still provokes ferocious opposition, sometimes even physical threats. Genocide denial serves as an encouragement to racism and hate against Armenians and other non-Muslim minorities. Some want to pretend that acknowledging the reality of the Armenian Genocide [2]is an attack on all Turkish people and on "Turkishness". It is not: it is a step towards justice.

Several years ago, the genocide of Armenians began to be commemorated in Turkey itself. The participants are still few but their number grows every day despite an official discourse of genocide-denial. Today, those among us who have taken part in these commemorations in Turkey are calling for solidarity beyond borders.

This year on 24 April - the widely recognised starting date of the massacre - we ask citizens, civil society leaders, antiracist activists, intellectuals and artists, of Armenian and other diverse origins, in Turkey and across the world, to unite in calling for the historical fact of the Armenian Genocide to be recognised at last.

Our shared initiative is one of solidarity, of justice, and of democracy.

It is an initiative of solidarity between all who fight for historical truth. Today the divide is not between Turks and Armenians, but between those who struggle for the recognition of the Armenian Genocide, whatever their origins are and wherever they live, and those who promote denial. In a word, it is not a question of blood, but of ideas; not a question of origins, but of a common goal.

It is an initiative of justice. In the words of writer and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel [3], "Genocide kills twice, the second time by silence." Denial, then, is the perpetuation of genocide. Fighting against denial is trying to quell the trauma in Armenian communities from one generation to another. It is not an end to this part of history - because when it comes to genocide, there is unfortunately no true end - but it offers new generations the opportunity to look together towards the future.

Finally, it is an initiative for democracy. Echoing writer and Buchenwald survivor Jorge Semprun's frequent reminder, democracy requires vitality from civil society. Strengthening Turkish civil society by establishing bridges with the rest of the European civil society is strengthening democratic values, thus combating racism and promoting human rights, in Turkey as well as in the rest of Europe.

In solidarity, for justice and democracy, for the respect of the victims and their descendents, we will commemorate together the Armenian Genocide on 24 April, in Turkey.

Signed by:

Benjamin Abtan, President of the European Grassroots Antiracist Movement - EGAM

Cengiz Algan & Levent Sensever, Spokespeople for Durde! (Turkey)

Alexis Govciyan , European President & Nicolas Tavitian, Member of the Board of the Armenian General Benevolent Union - AGBU (Europe)

Meral Çildir, Member of the Board of Directors & Ayse Gunaysu, Member of the Commission against Racism and Discrimination of the Turkish Association for Human Rights - IHD (Turkey)

newstatesman.com

Reply by Sukru Aya

Link To The Document




Reply to the young Human Rights Activist Mr. Benjamin Abtan and his posting egam-eu.blogspot proving is bias and affiliation with the "genocide fanfare". You can watch his TV interview on:

dailymotion.com/video

where two persons of Jewish and Armenian ethnicity make sev eral comments under the "Human Rights" umbrella, without having read "anything tangible, not even the Armenian historians". More dramatic is the fact that Mr. Abtan does not know even the latest history of the involvement of Dashnakist "Armenian Legion" in wiping his grandfathers viz: “Secrets Of A Christian Terrorist State Armenia” and the fact that Armenians being at War with Turks is confirmed not only by the League of Nations General Secretary Nansen ( if-armenians-fight-with-us-against-turks ) but also by official U.S.A.documents : (U.S.A. Affirms Armenians Were At War). To call any act "genocide", the action of annihilation must be planned and executed by a government. But here again let us see what the League of Nations at that time said which cannot be refuted, since there is no higher authority:

Copy of “Note Verbal” by Secretary-General Sir Eric Drummond, dated March 1st, 1920.

Page 2: “Further, in Turkey, minorities were often oppressed and massacres carried out by irregular bands who were entirely outside the control of the central Turkish Government."

Sukru Server Aya




- Don't they know that the CEO of the Coco-Cola Company, headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a Turk, named Muhtar Kent? He is scheduled to be the luncheon speaker at the ATAA Convention in Washinton D.C, April 27th. ? (E.B.) -

Reply by S.S. Aya: - Of course they know Muhtar Kent, CEO of Coca Cola and his recent affiliation with a joint NGO group to reply the diaspora allegations. May be they imply that the Armenians in USA will boycott drinking Coca-Cola and that will make the company bust! They of course do not know that:

1- Coca Cola has a manufacturing plant in Turkey and several bottling plants, and they would not want to lose the Turkish market of 75.000.000 versus 500.000 Armenians in USA.

What a sick mentality to "bottle the genocide palaver in Coca-Cola container"! Or should they add "Armenian hatred in the formula", so all drinkers hate Turks?

2- See: Necdet Kent or Ismail Necdet Kent (1911 – September 20, 2002) was a Turkish diplomat who risked his life to save Jews during World War II. While vice consul-general in Marseilles, France between 1941 and 1944, he gave Turkish citizenship to dozens of Turkish Jews living in France who did not have proper identity papers, to save them from deportation to the Nazi gas chambers.

3- Muhtar Kent, is the son of Necdet Kent, to whom Jewish Diaspora owes so much for his saving Jews by thousands in France from Holocaust, when "Nazi Armenian Legion" were rounding them up in Europe. Just inform A.F.L. or other Jewish lobbies and let them handle the "treatment of their heros by Armenian Lobby and their pipe blowers". But I am afraid they do not know their own past!


4- ARMENIAN GENOCIDE?: What a Gigantic palaver based on grand-ma stories and hearsays but not a shred of document or logic or reason or numbers or eyewitnesses and most important at all "verdict by an authorized Iternational Court". Can you belie the following document or give me a contradictory documents? No? So why all this palavers and shoutings? Study your history and face realities Ahbariks!

5- Armenian Genocide? Did you read your own history for example: http://armenians-1915.blogspot.com/2011/07/3294-memorandum-presented-to-council-of.html If you do not have the courage to click and see the document, you must observe at least the following statement, which "flushes all GENOCIDE tunes, articles and endless palavers"!

“University of Bradford” Armenia and the League of Nations Documents from the United Nations Library, Geneva; League of Nations Archives Collections

Copy of “Note Verbal” by Secretary-General Sir Eric Drummond, dated March 1st, 1920.

Page 2: “Further, in Turkey, minorities were often oppressed and massacres carried out by irregular bands who were entirely outside the control of the central Turkish Government .

If you are still not convinced sent your comment to newsrush@gmail.com so that the whole world can read your "knowledge, logic and size of your global palavers".

Take Care, good luck,
S.S. Aya

.
Read More
Posted in Sukru AYA | No comments

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

3397) Secret Life of Professor Vahakn Dadrian

Posted on 1:47 PM by Unknown
Vahakn Dadrian

Sexual harassment in educational institutions remains a pressing issue in many countries, including the USA. The recent scandalous Jerry Sandusky case, which sent shockwaves through the American society, demonstrated how persistent ignoring of the reports about sexual abuse in order to protect the reputation of the university allowed the predator to continue his criminal activity for many years. However, this case is not the first and is just one of the many, and sexual predators operated in university environment for decades. One such example is Vahakn Norayr Dadrian, Director of Genocide Research at a think tank called Zoryan Institute, who has a long history of sexual abuse.

We tried to shed some light on the obscure facts from Dr Dadrian's past. While getting into the details of Dr Dadrian’s biography, we also found weird contradictions in the information he provided about his early years, and we made a parallel research on that subject as well
. . .

Education

Early years of Dadrian are shrouded in obscurity. He was born in Istanbul, and after completing a school moved to Europe for undergraduate education. However information about his education in Europe is conflicting, and tended to evolve over the time.

Dadrian’s resume of 1963, signed by him and attached to a potential employment-related correspondence said that he studied philosophy in Berlin, social psychology in Vienna and political science in Zurich. 1 But his 1968 resume stated that Dadrian did undergraduate studies at the Universities of Berlin, Vienna, and Zurich in mathematics, philosophy, and political science.2 In late 1980s Dadrian started writing on the topics of genocide and international law, and his resume was adjusted accordingly, stating that Vahakn N. Dadrian received his undergraduate education in Europe studying philosophy, mathematics, and international law at the Universities of Vienna, Berlin, and Zurich, respectively.3 According to Dadrian’s latest resume, he “received his undergraduate education in Europe at the University of Berlin (mathematics), the University of Vienna (history) and the University of Zürich (international law)”.4

The chapter dedicated to Dadrian in the book “Portraits of Hope: Armenians in the Contemporary World” by Huberta Von Voss mentions Dadrian “moving to Berlin at the end of World War II to study mathematics”. The book further states that “more years of study ensued in Vienna at the history seminar. Then he went to Zurich to study international law”.5 Dadrian himself stated in an interview that he studied mathematics in Berlin, and then went to the University of Vienna at the age of 21.6 As Dadrian was born in 1926, according to this interview he must have been in Vienna in 1947.

It is difficult to get a clue what exactly and when Dadrian studied in Europe. Since he moved to the USA in 1947, it was impossible to complete 3 Universities in 2 years, i.e. in 1945-1947.

Information provided by the archives of Humboldt University of Berlin (which was called Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Berlin in 1940s) brings clarity to this issue. In reality, Dadrian moved to Berlin in January 1943, and enrolled to a philosophy class. He studied at the Faculty of Arts, while Mathematics was at the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences.7


In summer 1944 he went to Vienna University, where he attended lectures in history, philosophy and psychology at the Philosophical Faculty,8 and returned to Berlin in December 1944 to enrol to a pedagogy class. By the end of war in May 1945 Dadrian left Berlin University, never to return. 9 So it turns out that Dadrian has never studied math, and he did not move to Berlin “at the end of WWII”.

What is surprising is not the fact that Dadrian studied in Germany, which is well known for its quality of education, but the time of his studies. One can only wonder why at the height of the World War II out of all European countries Dadrian chose for his education Germany, which at the time was ruled by Nazis. It is known that the Nazis fired, deported or arrested all Jewish and dissident professors and students from Berlin University, and burned thousands of books from its library. It is also ironic that the future genocide scholar chose for his studies the same Vienna University that on the insistence of Nazis had expelled 2,200 students and teachers (most of them Jewish) and stripped of their academic titles hundreds of graduates, including famous writer Stefan Zweig, after Adolf Hitler annexed Austria in March 1938. 10 One possible explanation of young Dadrian’s choice of educational institutions could be an assumption that he believed in the future of the contemporary German regime.

According to the archives of Zurich University, at the end of 1945 Dadrian enrolled to the Department of Economics at the Faculty of Law of Zurich University, where he studied until the middle of 1947.11 The Department of Economics was a part of the Faculty of Law and Political Science until 1992, when it was split into the separate Faculty of Economics. The archive records of Zurich University contain no information on what subject Dadrian was studying and which lectures he attended, but considering that he was enrolled to the Department of Economics, Dadrian must have followed a course in economics.

None of the 3 universities has any record that Dadrian received any degree or any diploma.

It is remarkable that Dadrian never openly mentioned when exactly he attended the European universities, and his biographies vaguely mention “post-war” Berlin. Dadrian himself says that he was in Vienna at the age of 21, while in reality he was there at the age of 18, i.e. in 1944. And contradictory information that Dadrian provided about the disciplines that he studied in Europe makes one wonder about his reasons for doing so.

Sex offense history 


Vahakn Dadrian immigrated to the USA in 1947. In August 1954 he received his PhD in social sciences at the Chicago University. Soon after, on 4 January 1955, he was arrested in Chicago on sex crime charges involving a 10-year-old boy. According to the report in Chicago Daily Tribune, Dadrian was arrested in his home by a police officer on complaint of the boy's father and charged with crime against nature (sodomy) and crime against a child. The child told police that Dadrian had stopped him the street and persuaded to go to Dadrian’s home, asking the boy to carry a package. A contemporary press report: 
Chicago Daily Tribune; Jan 6, 1955; pg. A2 

HOLDER OF Ph.D. DEGREE FACING 2 SEX CHARGES 

Vahakn Dadrian, 33, of 5442 Harper av., who received a doctor of philosophy degree in social sciences from the University of Chicago last August, will be arraigned in Felony court today on two sex charges involving a 10 year old boy. Charges are crime against nature and crime against a child.

Dadrian, who said he came to this country in 1946 from his native Turkey and was married three months ago, was arrested yesterday in his home by Detective Vito Contino of the Hyde Park police on complaint of the boy's father. Contino said the child told police that Dadrian had persuaded him to go to the Harper av. address after stopping the boy on the street and asking him to carry a package.

University officials revealed that Dadrian's degree had been awarded last Aug. 27.

Jury indictment count 1. Name of complainant obscured for privacy Jury indictment count 2. Name of complainant obscured for privacy Jury indictment count 3. Name of complainant obscured for privacy

count-1

count-2

count-3

According to court records, Dadrian bailed himself out of the jail for $5000. 12
To help realize the present value of this amount, it could be mentioned that the amount of $5000 in 1955 is worth $43,638.06 in 2013 according to the calculator of the Federal Reserve Bank.13 The median U.S. family income in 1955 was $4,418. 14


Matt Capone (left) leaves Chicago's Cook County Jail with his attorney, George Crane.
Dadrian hired George M. Crane, a well-known defence attorney in Chicago. Crane defended more than 500 persons charged with murder, and among his high-profile clients was Matt Capone, the younger brother of the famous gangster Al Capone. Crane got younger Capone acquitted on murder charges. Dadrian waived the jury trial, probably at the advice of his attorney. Apparently, the skills of the prominent attorney greatly contributed to the judge finding Dadrian not guilty on 25 May 1955.

Considering that Dadrian lived for many years in Europe, and then in the USA without having any permanent job, was able to pay the bail equal to the median US family income, and hired one of the best lawyers in town, he clearly had financial means. He might have been supported by his elder brother Vahe, who already lived in the USA by the time Vahakn moved there, or used the funds of his late father, Hagop, who was a wealthy lawyer and landowner in Istanbul. 15
There were many wealthy and prominent Armenians in Istanbul, and even now there’s still a large and thriving Armenian community there.

In late 1973 Dadrian applied to the Circuit Court of Cook County with a petition to expunge all records of his criminal case, and the permission to do so was granted. The complainant who was ten in 1955 died prematurely in 1985 at the age of 41. However the subsequent events showed that Dadrian’s arrest in 1955 was not just a coincidence.

Despite the criminal incident in Chicago, Dadrian managed to pursue a career in the field of education. Already in October 1955 he left Chicago and became an assistant sociology professor at the Washington College in Maryland.16 But soon after, in March 1956, Dadrian resigned, claiming that he was going to write his second doctoral dissertation in political economy at the University of Zurich. 17

However, instead Dadrian took part as a researcher in an opinion research project by a New York advertising consultant James Vicary in fall 1956 – winter 1957,18 which achieved widespread notoriety for producing fraudulent results. In the same year of 1957 Vicary claimed that he was able to substantially increase sales of Coca Cola and popcorn in a movie theater by using subliminal advertising, flashing the messages "Drink Coca-Cola" or "Eat Popcorn" on the screen every 5 seconds, for less than 1/1,000th of a second, while an audience was watching a movie. After much criticism, Vicary admitted in 1962 that he'd made up the whole story in an effort to revive his failing marketing business. 19

In March 1957 Dadrian moved to the remote University of Idaho to work as acting assistant sociology professor. 20 Later Dadrian mostly worked as an assistant sociology professor in various US universities, and in 1971 he was appointed a sociology professor at the State University of New York – College at Geneseo. But in 1981 Dadrian was again accused of sex offences, this time sexual harassment of his female students.

That year, an outside arbitrator found him guilty of four sexual harassment charges, all referred to one student. She charged "improper physical contact" when Dadrian tried to hug and kiss her in his office, and on the same day he made inquiries into her sex life. Twenty one days later Dadrian again made "improper physical contact" when he pulled her by the arm in the hall in an attempt to talk to her and "physically detained" her when he backed her into a corner. 21

Though three other female students accused Dadrian of similar behaviour towards them (plus one girl accused him of a non-sexual offense), only one case was considered. The arbitrator dismissed another four sexual harassment charges by two girls because of untimeliness, as any charges had to be filed within approximately one year of the incident to be considered, and other students did not complain until the first girl did. Dadrian was found not guilty on another two charges, including an attempt to kiss a female student, because the arbitrator found the testimony of two girls pressing those charges to be “contradictory”. 22

As result, Dadrian was suspended for one month without pay, but was not fired. The reason was that the arbitrator considered these incidents to be isolated events rather than reflections of a longstanding pattern of behaviour. Another key factor in the decision was the location of Geneseo and the content of student population. Since most of the students were from small towns the arbitrator concluded that many of the students were "unsophisticated, impressionable, and immature as compared to a larger college.” 23 This was quite a bizarre argumentation for the decision that allowed Dadrian to continue harassment of students for another decade.

The decision led to a student protest on the day of Dadrian's return to the classroom, and concerned students, staff and faculty formed Geneseo Committee Against Sexual Harassment, which collected over 1,000 signatures on the petition asking SUNY administrators to investigate the case further to "protect our students from further harassment by Professor Dadrian in the months and years to come." 24 The committee stated that it had “uncovered further information that contradicts the arbitrator's assertion that Dadrian's behavior was “an expression of impulsiveness and poor judgment.””25

But the protests had no effect, and Dadrian evaded the punishment again, until another incident in 1990, when yet another female student pressed sexual harassment charges against him. The incident took place when Dadrian kissed the 18-year-old freshman student on the lips after she helped him rehang a banner welcoming him back to school after attending a conference.26

The student filed a formal complaint, which the school investigated, and found substance to the allegation. The 64-year-old professor was offered a chance to resign, but he appealed the decision, and the matter was submitted to binding arbitration. Arbitrator Carol Wittenberg found Dadrian guilty of sexual harassment, and the school dismissed the professor in April 1991.27 A year later Dadrian applied to the Court of Appeals of New York, contesting the decision of the SUNY Geneseo, but his motion for leave to appeal was denied, i.e. the Court did not allow the appeal to proceed.28

Conclusion


Dadrian was fired from SUNY Geneseo in 1991, i.e. some 20 years ago. But his story demonstrates how a shrewd sexual predator can evade punishment for decades and present himself as a reputable educator, which allowed him to continue his activity in the university environment. It is quite possible that the real extent of harassment is much larger, as not every student dares to press charges against a professor. The bizarre decision of the 1981 arbitrator who considered the college students to be “immature”, and the professor’s molestation acts to be “singular events” despite numerous complaints indicates the failure of the university system to protect the students. If Dadrian’s 1955 criminal charges had been considered when employing him as a teacher, or if he had been removed from the University after the first proven harassment incident, it could have saved the students from decades of further sexual harassment.




1 V. N. Dadrian to Irving Louis Horowitz, April 24, 1963, Transactions-Horowitz Archive, Pennsylvania State University Libraries, http://collection1.libraries.psu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/transaction/id/1280↩

2 ‘Back Matter, About the Authors’, Journal of Peace Research 5, no. 4 (1968), http://www.jstor.org/stable/422473. 2

3 ‘Contributors’, Genocide Studies and Prevention 1, no. 2 (September 2006): 225–226, http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/genocide_studies_and_prevention/v001/1.2.contributors.pdf.3

4 ‘Vahakn N. Dadrian. Brief Biography and Bibliography of Published Works’ (Zoryan Institute, July 17, 2009), 4, http://www.zoryaninstitute.org/Announcements/Dadrian%20CV%20July%2017,%202009.pdf. 4

5 Huberta Von Voss, Portraits of Hope: Armenians in the Contemporary World, trans. Alasdair Lean, Berghahn Series (Berghahn Books, 2007), 62, http://books.google.com/books?id=r3vbswx_1TEC.5

6 Alyssa A. Lappen, ‘Armenia’s Tears’, FrontPage Magazine, May 2, 2005, http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=8749.6

7 Dr Winfried Schultze, Head librarian, Universitätsarchiv, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, ‘Re: Diploma’, October 31, 2012, email communication.7

8 Mag. Barbara Bieringer, Archiv der Universität Wien, ‘Wahakn DADRIAN’, November 16, 2012, email communication.8

9 Dr Winfried Schultze, Head librarian, Universitätsarchiv, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, ‘Re: Diploma’.9

10 ‘Memorial Book Dedicated to the Victims of National Socialism at the University of Vienna 1938’, University of Vienna, accessed April 12, 2013, http://gedenkbuch.univie.ac.at/index.php?id=433&L=2; The Associated Press, ‘University of Vienna Honors 2,200 Jews Expelled by Nazis’, Haaretz Daily Newspaper, July 2, 2009, http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/2.209/university-of-vienna-honors-2-200-jews-expelled-by-nazis-1.279264.10

11 Inge Moser, Mitarbeiterin Aktenerschliessung, Universitätsarchiv, Universität Zürich, ‘Re: Diploma’, November 5, 2012, email communication.11

12 People of the State of Illinois v. Vahakn Dadrian, 55CR-129 (Criminal Court of Cook County 1955).12

13 ‘The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis’, accessed April 12, 2013, http://www.minneapolisfed.org/.13

14 Youth Indicators, 1996 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 1996), 44, http://nces.ed.gov/pubs96/96027.pdf14

15 Von Voss, Portraits of Hope: Armenians in the Contemporary World, 62; Lappen, ‘Armenia’s Tears’.15

16 ‘College Enrolls 467; Adds 12 To Staff’, The Washington Elm (Washington College, October 8, 1955), http://www.archive.org/details/washingtonelm195458wash.16

17 ‘Dadrian Resigns; To Continue Study’, The Washington Elm (Washington College, March 3, 1956), http://www.archive.org/details/washingtonelm195458wash.17

18 Dadrian to Horowitz, April 24, 1963.18

19 S.O. Lilienfeld et al., 50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology: Shattering Widespread Misconceptions About Human Behavior (John Wiley & Sons, 2011), 38–39, http://books.google.com/books?id=8DlS0gfO_QUC.19

20 ‘Austria, Turkey Natives Hired to Teach at Idaho’, Spokane Daily Chronicle, March 20, 1957, http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=0FBYAAAAIBAJ&sjid=7_YDAAAAIBAJ&pg=7122,4891564&dq.20

21 Julienne Bostic, ‘Geneseo Prof. Suspended in Sexual Harassment Case’, Albany Student Press, March 3, 1981, http://library.albany.edu/speccoll/findaids/issues/1981_03_03.pdf; Edwin Darden, ‘Professor Suspended For Harrassment’, Livingston County Leader (Geneseo NY, February 4, 1981), http://fultonhistory.com/Newspaper%2017/Geneseo%20NY%20Livingston%20Leader/Geneseo%20NY%20Livingston%20Leader%201981/Geneseo%20NY%20Livingston%20Leader%201981%20-%200071.pdf.21

22 Darden, ‘Professor Suspended For Harassment’.22

23 Ibid.23

24 ‘Over 1000 Sign Sex Harassment Petition’, Livingston County Leader (Geneseo NY, March 11, 1981), http://www.fultonhistory.com/Newspaper%2017/Geneseo%20NY%20Livingston%20Leader/Geneseo%20NY%20Livingston%20Leader%201981/Geneseo%20NY%20Livingston%20Leader%201981%20-%200166.pdf; Associated Press, ‘Geneseo Fires Professor For Sexual Harassment’, Albany Times Union, April 25, 1991, sec. Local, http://albarchive.merlinone.net/mweb/wmsql.wm.request?oneimage&imageid=5599449.24

25 ‘Over 1000 Sign Sex Harassment Petition’.25

26 Associated Press, ‘Geneseo Fires Professor For Sexual Harassment’.26

27 Ibid.27

28 Vahakn N. Dadrian v. State University New York/Geneseo, 186 AD2d 1099 (Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department 1992), http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.19921007_0050968.NY.htm/qx; Vahakn N. Dadrian v. State University New York/Geneseo, 81 NY2d 702 (Court of Appeals of New York 1993), http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.19930107_0040169.NY.htm/qx.28

Source


Some Reference Sources




Direct Link To The Mentioned Sources

.
Read More
Posted in Vahakn DADRIAN | No comments

Monday, April 8, 2013

3396) How To Glorify The Armenian Terrorism ?

Posted on 1:01 AM by Unknown


No one knows where ASALA fighter was buried
January 30, 2012

St. Poghos-Petros church in Paris offered a liturgy on Sunday in memory of ASALA freedom fighter Levon Ekmekdjian.

On August 7, 1982, ASALA organized the Esenbog(a International Airport attack in Ankara, Turkey. It was perpetrated by the "Pierre Gulumian commando" group from the Armenian militant organization ASALA (Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia). The attack, called Karin-Erzrum by ASALA, was carried out by Zohrab Sarkissian and Levon Ekmekdjian. Sarkissian was killed during the attack while Ekmekdjian was wounded and arrested. He was found guilty of carrying out armed action and sentenced to death on 7 September 1982. He was hanged on 29 January 1983, it being the last death penalty carried out in Turkey
. . .

It is still unknown where Ekmekdjian is buried. Turkey rejected the demand of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to return the martyr's body to his family.


http://www.a1plus.am/en/politics/2012/01/30/asala

.
Read More
Posted in Armenian TERROR | No comments

Sunday, March 31, 2013

3395) The (Former) US Ambassador Has Falsified The History

Posted on 11:14 AM by Unknown


Dr Pat Walsh: Morgenthau’s Book Is A Propagandist Construct Around Actual Events, For A Political Purpose 
 
Dr. Pat Walsh’ Speech, Istanbul, March 30, 2013, “Rahmi M. Koc. Museum”

It gives me great pleasure to launch ‘Preposterous Paradoxes of Ambassador Morgenthau’ by Şükrü Server Aya on behalf of Athol Books. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all of you for coming to this significant event and hope you will take something away from it.

Athol Books sees this event as part of a project to re-establish Ireland’s and Turkey’s common links in History going back to the time when the Ottoman Sultan Abdulmajid I provided much needed relief to the Irish people during the Great Famine of 1847. It encompasses the links between the countries’ independence struggles at the close of World War I. The founding document of Irish independence, ‘The 1916 Proclamation’ addresses “our gallant allies in Europe” and Dáil’s Éireann’s first venture into foreign affairs, ‘Message to the Free Nations of the World’ was delivered to the Grand National Assembly at Ankara, in late 1921.

Both Turkey and Ireland had treaties imposed upon them in 1920/1 by the same Great Power. Ataturk was written about in Ireland as a great inspiration to those struggling against Imperialism, showing how foreign imposed treaties could be broken and an independent nation emerge.

This will be the fourth book by Şükrü Aya published in English on the tragic events of 1915 in Eastern Anatolia. Aya’s method is straightforward and involves finding the “documented facts” and laying them down to the “judgment of the reader”. His work is an important addition to the effort to find the truth behind events that are being increasingly rendered historically false and presented in the realm of political propaganda.
. .


I would like to start with a story that will show you the importance of the issue that Şükrü Aya writes about in his new book.

About a year ago I attended a residential course for History teachers. This course was in Northern Ireland, where I come from, and which, you will all be aware, has experienced many years of conflict.

In recent years many organizations have had an interest in promoting ‘conflict resolution’ and the one that held this conference is from Massachusetts in the United States and is called ‘Facing History and Ourselves.’



The conference was mainly about teaching children the lessons of the Jewish Holocaust - presumably so that things like this would not be repeated. A 600 page book was given to the teachers in attendance with readings to use in the classroom. It is called ‘Facing History and Ourselves – Holocaust and Human Behavior’

Although this book has over 500 pages of readings and commentaries on the Jewish Holocaust it also has a section on the Armenians and the events of 1915.

It says “In 1915, soon after the war began, Turkey, which then ruled the Ottoman Empire, turned against the Armenians, a Christian minority that had lived for generations within the Muslim Ottoman Empire. The Armenians were accused of divided loyalties, because there were Armenians in Russia as well as in the Ottoman Empire and Russia was now the enemy.” (p.103)

There was no background about how the Armenians had lived as the ‘loyal community’ for centuries in the great collaboration of the Ottoman Empire, no mention of the 1907 agreement between Britain and Russia that effectively promised Constantinople to the Czar in return for his help in destroying Germany in a coming war; no explanation about how the Great War had come to the Ottoman Empire, no hint of why Russia had suddenly become ‘the enemy,’ and nothing at all about the activities of Armenian nationalists that might have encouraged the belief that they then had ‘divided loyalties.’

The next section of the book contains a long reading from ‘Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story’ which is presented as entirely factual and is used as evidence of what is termed “the greatest crime of the ages.”

At the end of this reading the book says; “The word genocide was coined during World War II to describe the murder of an entire people. Although the word did not yet exist in 1915, the crime took place nonetheless.” (p.106)

This is completely inaccurate. The word ‘genocide’ existed in 1915. However, the word ‘extirpate’ was used much more widely in the English-speaking world at that time. Charles Dilke used it to say in his best-selling book ‘Greater Britain’ that the Anglo-Saxons were the greatest genocidal force in history. He said this in praise of genocide as a law of nature and being part of ‘progress’.

Nothing like the ‘extirpation’ practiced by European colonialism is applicable to the Ottoman State in relation to the Armenians or any other minority within the territory of the Empire. In fact, the Ottomans were criticized by British writers for their easy-going tolerance of races which, it was suggested, was leading to the demise of their empire. The British Social Darwinists were, in particular, appalled at the way the Ottomans had inter-married and incorporated other races into the governing of their empire and had blended aspects of their cultures into the Ottoman mix.

The book I was given connects its main subject of the Jewish Holocaust with the events of 1915 with the following sentence: “In 1939, as Hitler planned the murder of the Jews, he asked, “Who after all speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?”

This is despite the fact that the document that contains the notorious Hitler quote was rejected by the Nuremburg Court as an obvious forgery.

There is another reading in the book called ‘Truth: The Last Victim of Genocide’ and one called ‘The Politics of Denial.’ It contains the text from a debate held in the U.S. Senate in February 1990 and offers “copies of articles and documents to refute Senator Byrd and his supporters.” i.e. those who questioned the allegation of denial (p.505).

The message is clear: to deny the allegations of an Armenian ‘genocide’ is to be a ‘Holocaust denier’ – so beware!

Not surprisingly, none of the young teachers questioned anything said at this conference. It is easy to be overawed by the material on the Nazis and the Holocaust and the tendency is to keep quiet, even when it is being linked to events in Ottoman Turkey or Ireland. I think everyone present doubted the relevance of it to Ireland but no one knew much about the Armenians or the Ottomans so there would have been a general unquestioning acceptance of this material. And if anyone had any thoughts they were surely deterred by the warning that they would be lining up with the ‘Holocaust deniers.’

I questioned what I was hearing at this conference and was immediately treated as if I had offended some scripture in a sacred religious book. I tried to explain that I knew something of these events and their context, having researched and written a book about Britain’s Great War on Turkey and that the depiction of the Ottoman Empire was a travesty of the truth and its explanation of the why the Ottomans relocated the Armenians was a simplistic distortion.

I could also not see why teachers needed ‘free resources’ to refute the case against an Armenian ‘genocide.’ What had that to do with the teaching of history? It was sheer political propaganda and brainwashing!

I think it must have been the first time someone had argued against what these people were saying and requiring us to believe and teach. They seemed to be shocked that anyone would even question them. But they chose not to argue. Debate was closed!

This reminded me of Geoffrey Robertson QC.

I presume that you will be aware of Geoffrey Robertson QC as being one of the prime movers in wishing to charge Turkey with genocide over the events that happened in Anatolia in 1915.

Mr. Robertson has put it on record that he wishes for historians to stop discussing the events of 1915 altogether. He declared in Yerevan last year that: “The historians have completed their mission, now it is the time for judges, who will demand proper punishment for guilt and compensation for the Genocide victims. It is no longer a subject of historians but judges.”

Whatever about the historians, Şükrü Aya has not completed his mission…

In the ‘New Statesman’ of 10th December 2009 Robertson made it clear that the case, for him, is already closed. He stated: “… genocide is a matter for legal judgment, not a matter for historians, and there is no dispute about the Armenian genocide among legal scholars.”

It is clear from this statement that Robertson does not want books like Şükrü Server Aya’s to be written and he wants historians to be silenced about history. He wishes International Law to be the supreme arbiter on history and its decision to be final and binding.

By reducing the event of ‘genocide’ to a legal decision one is making it into a subjective judgment and a weapon of foreign policy for the purposes of gaining leverage on other states.

I do not share Robertson’s faith in International Law. It seems to me to be applied only when it suits the great powers in the world and forgotten about when it does not. It is overwhelmingly applied to the ‘lesser states’ by the ‘superior’ states who appear to be above it themselves. In many ways it is the old ‘civilizing’ mission of Imperialism in a new guise of ‘ethical foreign policy’.

So I prefer to trust in the historians who look for the truth, like Şükrü Aya.

When you know that historically inaccurate propaganda material is being presented across the English-speaking world to teachers in order to inform impressionable children and jurists like Geoffrey Robertson are urging an ‘end of history’ and ‘case closed’ you can see the importance of Sükrü Aya’s book.

The important point in my story is how central the book of Ambassador Morgenthau remains. It is the corner-stone of the case against the Ottomans about the events of 1915.

As Professor Justin McCarthy says:
“Morgenthau has long held a prominent place in what has become the popularly accepted history of the events of World War I. His descriptions of Armenian suffering feature prominently in accusations that the Ottomans committed genocide. The difficulty, as demonstrated by Aya, is that Morgenthau readily accepted fabricated evidence and himself falsified the record.”

Morgenthau spent 26 months as U.S. Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire from November 1913 to February 1916. During this time he composed a lengthy diary and many letters which formed the basis of his book, ‘Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story.’ The book contains narrations of long conversations with, and statements of, various German and Ottoman officials which are placed in quotation marks. This device adds credibility to the account - as if the statements are taken down verbatim. And yet they cannot be found in the diary or letters, the original sources of the book.

The book seems to have been the concoction of a team of propagandists. The journalist, Burton J. Hendrick was the sensationalist ghost-writer. Morgenthau’s Armenian Secretary, Hagop S. Andonian, on whom the Ambassador relied for translations, was heavily involved after being allowed to ‘elaborate’ himself in writing up the original diary. The Ambassador’s interpreter, Arshag K. Schmavonian was another key constructor. And Morgenthau had no direct experience of the events he was writing about in Eastern Anatolia, having never left Istanbul in his tenure as Ambassador.

It is perhaps not fully understood that Morgenthau’s work had serious implications for the future peace of the world. Its intention was to foster an American intervention in what was fundamentally an Imperialist war on Germany and the Ottoman Empire. The U.S., acting on the principles of George Washington, was disinclined to join this foreign war of conquest but it did so with the help of Morgenthau’s propaganda and the British Wellington House publications it fed into.

Only with U.S. assistance were Britain and France able to crush Germany and seize the territories of the Ottoman Empire they desired to control. The result was a punitive peace treaty and economic ruin in Europe that produced Hitler and the Nazis and another World War two decades later. And the results of the Imperialist conquests of Britain and France that Morgenthau’s propaganda facilitated and the states they constructed are still to be seen in the Middle East today.

Professor McCarthy explains how Şükrü Aya demolishes Morgenthau’s published account:
“Aya’s method is simple. He takes Morgenthau’s statements and identifies the false, the prejudiced, and the impossible. He compares Morgenthau’s written accounts with his diaries, showing that much of what Morgenthau allegedly heard from Ottoman officials on plans to exterminate Armenians was complete invention. He analyzes the prejudices and political calculations that led to Morgenthau’s deception.”

Sükrü Aya was no scholar but he became a historian because of the sloppy work produced by those who are paid and honoured with titles to do better. Perhaps his experiences of commercial life has made him prepared to do the hard work of research that the academics avoided. Many professional historians seem to have contented themselves with relying on material like Morgenthau’s book as if it were the ‘truth’ rather than what it actually is – a propagandist construct around actual events, for a political purpose.

They really should have done the job Sükrü has done. But perhaps it would not have advanced their careers! Şükrü Aya has no concern for such things - his only interests are the facts and the truth!




Video distributed to guests as souvenir during the book presentation:





Direct Link To The Video





Ṣükrü Server Aya refutes the Armenian genocide allegations in his book authored in English.

The letter of the AP correspondent exposed




The following is a translation of a news piece that appeared at the AYDINLIK Daily Newspaper, Istanbul, on April 1, 2013, written by Irmak Mete.

Ṣükrü Server Aya who in the past has unearthed and exposed all the false claims and fabrications about the alleged Armenian Genocide has introduced his new book, titled “The Preposterous Paradoxes of Ambassador Morgenthau “. The book refutes, without any doubt, all the genocide claims made in the book “ The Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story”, written by the then U.S. Ambassador to Istanbul, Henry Morgenthau. Mr. Aya’s book explains and discloses the letter written to Ambassador Morgenthau by the AP (Associated Press) correspondent George A. Schreiner who was actually in Anatolia in 1915 who witnessed all the events of that time, objecting and disproving Morgenthau’s genocide claims contained in his book. Schreiner’s book also describes how the Armenians have been duped and promised by the Imperial Powers for granting them their independence and their own land if they fought against Turks with the Allies.

The introduction to the scholars, historians and general public of the book written by Mr. Aya in English under the name “ The Preposterous Paradoxes of Ambassador Morgenthau” was made two days ago at the Rahmi Koc Museum, Istanbul. The introduction was attended by the author, publisher Dr. Pat Walsh of Athol Books, Ireland, a writer in our editorial board Mr. Turker Erturk as well as numerous other writers, editors and historians.

During his talk to the audience, Mr. Aya explained the documents contained in his book that fully refutes all the allegations made by Morgenthau, also talked about another book, “ From Berlin to Bagdad “ written by George Abel Schreiner. The book contains a letter sternly written by Schreiner to Morgenthau on December 19, 1918, in which he said “Made some inquiries relative to massacres alleged to have happened in Pera. Everybody smiled. Then, they told me the name of the American correspondent who had disseminated these rumors from Salonica and Athens in the form of honest-to-goodness news dispatches. Also, the fact was mentioned that since then the Ottoman Government had been rather severe toward all foreign newspapermen. As to massacres – there have been no such things – of course.”

Aya also explained an important and a critical speech made by Fridthjof Nansen, the Secretary-General of The League of nations, the predecessor of today’s United Nations, on September 21, 1929, to the General Assembly, which is still kept in the UN Archives. The speech includes a statement where Nansen admits that the Armenians were promised their own land if they fought with the allies, but after the war has ended this promise was not kept eventhough the Armenians have suffered 200,000 deaths.

Aya said that he worked and researched all alone and tirelessly for years to find the truth. He continued, “ My work may not be finished before my death, but, I hope, me and my efforts will be quoted in the future as being at the right side of the fence.”

The editor of the publishing house Athol Books, Dr. Pat Walsh, who spoke after Mr. Aya, stated that some scholars have attained their positions by not studying and analyzing books like the one Mr. Aya just authored. “ However “ he continued, “ Mr. Aya has no such problems. All he is interested in are the legal and reliable documents and proofs”.


ONE MAN ARMY….


By Mr. Türker Ertürk, published in İlk Kurṣun, a Turkish language news portal and AYDINLIK Newspaper, on April 5th, 2013.

The introduction of Ṣükrü Server Aya’s new book, titled “ Preposterous Paradoxes of Ambassador Morgenthau” was made last Saturday to the national and international public at large and to the foreign and local press at the Koç Museum located in the Hasköy District of Istanbul.

I personally witnessed this historical event. In fact, my dear friend Ṣükrü honored me by giving me a chance to speak at the event. I am grateful and thankful.

Aya, in his book, exposes and disproves the so called “ Armenian Genocide” claims as lies and allegetions perpetrated by the imperialistic powers. Aya’s book displays , line by line, page by page, the mistakes and lies contained in the book, titled “ Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story “ who was in İstanbul between November 1913 and February 1916 as the U.S. Ambassador to the Ottoman Government.

Trashes the allegations using only the foreign documents and references

Ambassador’s own book, “ Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story” was very important. Simply because it was the . .



The interview with Ṣükrü Server Aya has been conducted by Sezin Özadalı of AYDINLIK Daily Newspaper

The author and researcher Mr. Ṣükrü Server Aya will announce and prove today to the whole world, through his book he recently authored in the English language, that the ‘genocide’ claims and allegations made by the Armenians are false and fabricated.

I have sat down and chatted with Mr. Aya regarding the Armenian allegations of genocide which is subject of his book titled “ Preposterous Paradoxes of Ambassador Morgenthau “ which will be introduced to the market for sale today.
Those who accuse us are the charlatans in the U.S.

Aydınlık : Have you received any negative response in this suject from the Armenian citizens of Turkey ?

Aya : I am a friend of Armenians. Our struggle is not with Armenians or any other nation. We perceive and regard man as human being. We do not evaluate or consider at all the man’s skin color, his race or nationality. Our opponents are those charlatans who have gone to the U.S. lately and finding no suitable work to make a living and thus re-kindling or re-creating this issue. My biggest supporters are the young Armenians. But they conceal their identity due to their fear for their safety.

How have the Armenian allegations surfaced ? . . .


Aya : They have been making a living by extorting money since 1890. And most of that money has been taken from their own people, the Armenians. They have killed those who have not submitted to their demands. This scheme has come to a point during the Ottomans period that they even have killed their own mayor who had not yielded to their demands for money. The grand father of the terrorist organization PKK today in Turkey is the Armenian Dashnak terrorists. After their establishment, they started extorting money from people by saying “ We need money for this national struggle. We will make a list of names who are expected to pay and will kill those who would not come up with money “. At times, the names of those people who are expected to pay have been printed in the newspapers. And the killings have been displayed to the public at large to teach them a lesson and to create terror atmosphere. As a result, everyone has paid up. The money was the only thing that mattered. The estimated budget of this extortion business was about $ 1 Billion. The money collected using the ‘genocide’ as a tool did not at all go to the poor people but to the rich only to make them richer. It was a large commercial business. Everyone sells something, i.e., some sell ‘hope’, others sell ‘love’. They sold ‘hate’.

How is ‘hate’ sold ?

Aya: In the Armenian Youth Camps in the U.S. they inject ‘hate’ to the hearts and minds of 10-11 years old children. The same age children in Armenia in military fatigues are trained in how to use gun and kill human beings. The ‘hate’ injetion starts at the cradle.

What did U.S. Ambassador’s Diary contain ?

Aya : The Ambassador has received a warm welcome and shown a lot of respect in the Ottoman Empire although he had no diplomatic experience and credentials. He made a lot of money in his real estate investments and donated sizeable amount of this money to election campaign funds of President Wilson who in turn had appointed him to the ambassadorial position in Istanbul which was the capital city of the Ottoman Empire. In Istanbul, he was very much involved in the money transactions for the Jewish people. He remained in Istanbul for 780 days and I counted 240 days were spent in Jewish business matters and dealings. Both of his two secretaries were Armenians. He was told most of the things in his diary by these two people. All the documents he used in his book was delivered to him by them. But since he was an ambassador, everyone including even today’s politicians, have taken his book without any reservation and questioning. He wrote his book or had it written under his name by others, 3 years after his return to the U.S. The main reason for him to write this book ( or have it written for him ) was to create or demonstrate to President Wilson a credible reason for the U.S. to enter the World War I.

Does his book tell the truth ?

Aya : Not at all, it is totally false and fabricated. The origin of all these lies were the two Armenian secretaries mentioned earlier whom he brought with him to the U.S. Since the statements appeared to be told by the US Ambassador, the book has been taken as a respectable and believeable resource for the Armenian allegations of genocide. We proved in my book that even the one and only respected resource Armenians had was totally unreliable and not trustworthy.

There is a reference in your book to the works of Mr. Mehmet Perinçek who is a Research Associate in the Istanbul University and who is also a suspect these days in the Ergenokon trials.

Aya : I have included in my book a chapter written by Mr. Perinçek about Talat Pasha based on his extensive research of the Russian State archives. I appreciate him a lot as a scholar. He is an excellent academician. He studied the Russian archives as related to the Armenian issue which was something not done by anyone else. I personally studied the British and American archives. So, our studies complemented each other.

Thank you very much Mr. Aya.







AYDINLIK 30.3.2013

PREPOSTEROUS PARADOXES OF U.S. AMBASSADORS by Türker Ertürk

He was born in 1930 in the City of Galati, Romania. The name of the city which means ‘ bastion, castle, ‘ is actually derived from the Turkish Kuman dialect. His family has arrived from Trabzon, Turkey in the 19th centuery and settled in the City of Sulina which is located at the point of discharge of Danube River into the Black Sea. Sulina, at that time, was known for its relatively large settlement of people of Turkic origin.

After Soviet invasion in August 1939 of Moldovia ( then called Bassarebia ), his family picks up the roots and moves back to Istanbul, Turkey, the homeland, in a cargo ship displaying a Turkish flag.

He was accepted to Robert College – now called Bosphorous University, after finishing his elementary, middle and high school education. He interrupts his education in order to work and support his family after the death of his father in an accident at the sea in 1951. He later returns back to school and completes his college education in 1953.
He establishes his own business after the school, involved in international trade, earning a living while travelling the world during the following 50 years. As his age advances, he finally retires from the active business life. Instead of going fishing and exchanging hunting stories with his friends in the years following his retirement, he chooses the hard way.

During his childhood in Arnavutköy, İstanbul, he makes a lot of friends, Armenian children among them. However, he has been confused and worried by the allegations made later by the Armenians. He is interested in history and at the end, he decides; he would look deep into the events of 1915. Did his ancesters really committ “ genocide “ or were all those claims judgement without trial ?

The claims were all baseless.

He rolls up his sleeves to find out the truth. He screens and reviews all the books, magazines and articles claiming the ‘Armenian Genocide’. He finally reaches the truth that all these claims are false and fabricated as part of a larger project. He has authored five books until today, three in English and two in Turkish, about the so called genocide claims along with hundreds of articles and essays.

This dear person is Ṣükrü Server Aya. I have had the honor of meeting him in a TV show where we were both invited. We have been very good friends since that day. I am priviledged to call him “ Dear Brother Ṣükrü”.

Tomorrow, March 30th, 2013, at 3.30 pm, there will be the introduction, to the press and the group of national and international scholars, writers and historians, of his most recent book, titled “ Preposterous Paradoxes of Ambassador Morgenthau “ at the Rahmi Koç Museum in Hasköy, İstanbul.

Ambassador Morgenthau has served as the US Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, located in İstanbul, between November 1913 and February 1916. The Ambassador has a book he has written later, about his relationship with and the conversations and opinions of the leaders of the Committee of Union and Progress ( CUP), and about what he has heard regarding the Forced Deportation of the Armenians in 1915, titled “ The Story of Ambassador Morgenthau”.

This book is considered by the Armenians as an ‘invaluable’ source for their genocide claims. A quite a large portion of their claims are based on this book. But this book is based on lies, false accusations and fabrications. Even the real author of this book is quite suspicious and debatable.

Morgenthau has not traveled even 6 miles away from his office in İstanbul during his tenure there. The book heavily relies on the statements of his two Armenian interpreters and office workers; Arshag Schimavonian and Agop Andonian. The Ambassador, after returning to the U.S., asks and receives a permission from President Wilson to write a book accusing the Ottomans regarding the Armenians. He is not the ‘true’ writer of the book; the book actually has been written by the Pulitzer Prize winner writer Burton J. Hendrick, at a cost of 1.3 Million US Dollars ( at today’s rate).

And that is what Aya’s new book describes in detail, based on non-Turkish references and documents. The book contains irrefutable and non-negoitable documents and proof, not just a story or memoires. Please read this book and leave it to your grandchildren in your library as a valuable endowment.

They are getting ready for a final blow.

Two years later, it will be the 100th anniversary of the Armenians’ 1915 Genocide Claims. The Imperial Powers and, under their guidance, the Armenian Diaspora, are working very hard for that day. What has our own Government done regarding this issue during the recent 10 years they have been in power ? And what are they planning to do in the future ?

I am very proud of Ṣükrü Server Aya who, despite his advanced age, has been tirelessly working, using his own financial resources when required, serving his own Turkish Nation of which he has been a part. The societies feel proud by those serving them.

There is no doubt in my mind that the “ Armenian Genocide ” claims are imperialist lies and falsifications. And these lies have been created to clear the road for a much larger imperialistic plans and targets to be achieved. Just like Ergenekon and Balyoz lies….Therefore, it is quite normal to have contradictions within lies. The purpose of these two big lies are the realization of the bigger imperialistic plans directed or aimed towards our country and the region.
The lies may be contrversial within themselves but the imperial powers are right on target and quite within their plans, even 100 years after these lies have been created. The target was the Ottomans yesterday and is Turkey today.

The target is the destabilization of the region, the contraction of Turkish economical and political growth under the disguise of the false growth, being used as a subcontractor to export terror to its neighbours and finally the change of the regime in the country.

Don’t please get personally angry with the US Ambassadors, they are only civil servants receiving orders, coordinating the efforts and plans directed at our country and our region

Respectfully,

İLK KURṢUN

AYDINLIK 29.3.13 Column of Turker Erturk in English


The First Thing Our Teacher Of Philosophy Taught Us Was To Admit And Confess If You Do Not Know . .
Şükrü Server Aya – Book Launching Speech İstanbul, 30.3.2013

Esteemed Ladies and Gentlemen,

I had prepared a speech, starting with my thanks to almost a quarter of the guests and friends going back to my 60-70 years, newer friends with whom I share my life and express my appreciation o all. Then, I realized that only the “thanking part”, to include like the book printer Cengiz who sees me only now, my selected supporters, Ahmet Tekin, or several other names, Berk, Yildirim, Okur families and others, here and overseas who helped me in the preparation of this “imece” or communal work. So, please excuse my I treat time as first priority. I depend on the usual trust and tolerance of those few but selected buddies, some of which are here today to see the result of their fatigue.

My class mate world respected Mr. Rahmi Koc, is a friend to any one in need, be at time of sickness and even at funerals. He says that “anything older than half a century is considered to be antique”. Well, may be this is one good reason he extended this historical place to an event on history and he did it rather than visiting me at his hospital. I wish to express my open thanks not only to him, but the director and the young ladies who have been very great help. Now, speaking of ladies, antiquity and great help, I must say that all of us feel honored with the presence of a century old couple or Romeo and Juliet of Turkey, Muazzez abla who is 99 and his Romeo Hayrettin Karaca, world reputed for his preservation of nature, ethics, intelligence and his love the whole Turkey knows from TV screens. Seems they prefer to stay engaged rather than ending their love by the marriage event. I think we should all thank them for their being younger in action and soul compared to many others.

It is the first time that Dr. Pat Walsh and I meet, and he accepted to be the editor of my book. I hope he does not regret this togetherness, but he already read me inside out and may be this is will lead our becoming more productive before I am pulled out from the life stage in the remaining few years. I have a book titled by a person in his eighties titled “The Rest of Your Life is the Best of your Life”. True statement, but how can you be happy when you have your values as a “human” which you must share with the rest of all “other humans” but their aims and means differ. Let me clarify that I was and I am still fortunate to have many much decent and loveable Armenian friends from Turkey. We have no animosity against any race, nation, color, faith or tribe or Aborigines or Masais from Kenya. It is not the outside appearance and faith or traditions we inherit beyond our preference, but it is the values of honor, decency, equality and defending truth which we chose ourselves as we grow up. Have a look at the Note-cards distributed to you for your notes or written questions. You will see the blog of “Armenians-1915.blogspot.com” called also the “Genocide Resource Center”. Too many Turks go shortcut, and they do not click on this treasure chest with over 3400 postings (370s are mine) and over 100.000 pages of authentic articles, essays, review and news starting in 2005 and still going strong. Don’t look for my name in Turkish blogs or news, they do not care about me and I do not care about them. There are over 400 E-books over 100 Documentary videos, essays of various reputed names; It is all there in the refrigerator, all you have to is to go there, click and learn for your satisfaction. If you start today, it may take at least ten years to read or surf everything. The scholars, Dr. Walsh just mentioned, do not go there, they cherry pick and use only the few hundred pages of the books put in their front and they jump into decisions. The first thing our teacher of Philosophy taught us was to admit and confess if you do not know. Some of my friends here will remember Dr. Seelye, and his teaching us “I know that I don’t know”. Yes, some lesson that proves to be true and remembered 70 years later. Our biggest problem is that we have to deal with “scholars or writers or authorities, who do not know, but they think they know all, and hence feel happy with their level of ignorance or knowledge. This is what Walsh tried to tell you, of course much nicer than I can ever do.

Good speakers, usually start with a funny joke. Below quotes are taken verbatim from the blog of Armenians and reflect what their readers think about the essay or subject.

Date: 18/9/09: From Netherlands: - You cannot build a house without foundation. Armenian try. And will fail. Mr. Aya, again good work from you! You should get the medal of honor for your efforts defending Turks against these vilifiers -

Date: 21/8/10: Observer 2009 said: - Sukru Server Aya, one of the most prolific researchers on the issue of Turkish-Armenian conflicts, has doe it again. His analysis is balanced, sources of data respectable, message poignant, fair and clear. Those who believe the myth of “poor, starving Armenian victims” should read Aya’s review, of Sam Weem’s book. For visual aid to enhance Aya’s message, one is referred to the photos at www.ethocide.com. Congratulations, Mr. Aya, you have achieved what most scholars have not been able to: you have raised global awareness of one of the most persistent myths of the 20th Century: the bogus genocide claims of Armenian falsifiers and Turk haters.-

Date: March 2, 2013: Comment on Post 3298: …- Sukru is either working fort he Turkish government or is severely insane. He made me laugh, though. Peace to all.

Date: March 27, 2013: Observer has left a new comment on your Book Review 3379, Preposterous Paradoxes of Ambassador Morgenthau (by Prof. Ata Atun)
-I congratulate researcher and productive writer Sukru Server Aya for a careful study of the Morgenthau misrepresentations and fabrications that, unfortunately, some Armenian lobbyists are still promoting today. Morgenthau was a real estate developer who raised most funds for Wilson in 1912 presidential campaign and was rewarded with an ambassadorial post. He is neither a diplomat, nor a historian. He relied on whatever his male Armenian secretaries placed on his desk. His sources are all problematic: Armenian revolutionaries, Christian missionaries, foreign diplomats, soldiers and journalists. In spite of all this biased approach by this real estate agent Morgenthau, anti-Turkish circles continue to present him as a reliable diplomat-historian. Sukru Server Aya exposes Morgenthau for what Morgenthau is: practically an imposter… -

Dear guests, I gave you three examples of opinions on some of my over 370 articles which you can click on the menu of the blog. This is the part of what is happening on the unbiased Armenian forum. Did you note any Turks read or write there? The Armenian man who said that “I am either working for he Turkish Government or I am severely insane” has proven that he did not even click on my name on the internet and see if any one would give even a janitor’s job to a man 83 years of age. Never mind the Turkish government, is there any one to offer any job? And my unknown Armenian friend does not know that “NO ONE IS EVER PAID FOR TELLING THE TRUTH, it is the LIE that sells for good prices, continued jobs in USA or even some may get jackpots such as Nobel for books edited by an American professor of literature. In one of my interviews on a local Queens TV in New York, when asked, I had made it loud and clear that I was never approached by any one, I have received no offers, no sponsors, no backup and that these books have been financed and printed by me and the income from sales does not even cover my postage and investment costs. So, this “working matter is settled”.

As regards words of appreciation, congratulations and Medal of Honor (?), these I hear from foreigners I never see. On our side in Turkey, I do not wish to speak of the vain efforts to wake up persons or positions which produced no result other than silence and distance. In one particular case an important advisor who told me that he knew the subject quite well because of his previous posts, recommended me that when I write a book, I should follow Morgenthau and use the first hand source. My second book was on his desk and I asked him if he read the sixty pages I could spare on Morgenthau and added that I am prepared to write three hundred pages if any one places an order. Well, this is the type of ice sheets or closed mentalities I am trying to break through instead of being consulted and supported.

And now, let me add a few clarification remarks to few of the important subjects raised by Mr. Walsh. I thought that instead of speaking on another subject, it is better to show the dark half of the moon or the topic.

Walsh gave live examples of what happens in biased conferences, lectures and how the Armenian or Christian or political lobbies believe and support whatever is put in their front without questioning. In such cases, only a small portion of the argument is given in a biased way. Never mind the truth, not even the full picture and details which may create suspicion are ever shown.

For example no one says that Turks and Russians signed an agreement assuring full autonomy in the Six vilayets in the East and that even the Inspector Governors, Norwegian Colonel Hoff, and Dutch ex-governor Westenek arrived in spring 1914 to go to their capital cities, Erzurum and Van. But after the Sarajevo assassination it was sure that a war was to break for sure, so the project was suspended and governors paid and sent back. When the war was eminent the CUP government sent a delegation of 28 persons to Erzurum to the 8th Dashnak Congress in August to convince them to fight for Turks whilst the Armenians in Russia were to cause incidents that will busy Russian forces.

The reward offer “Autonomy” was guaranteed by Germany as well. But the Dashnaks consulted Russians British and French, who offered two more Vilayets to Armenians and so the Armenians turned down this golden offer of autonomy which was reoffered for their loyalty to fight.

When war started some Armenian soldiers in the Turkish army went to Russia with their arms to fight against Turks and back lines of supply were sabotaged. Armenians did the exact opposite of what they were hoped to do, in which case the whole Russian army in the Caucasus would have been taken prisoners and Turks reach the Baku oilfields.

In a counter attack by Turks at Christmas time through the high mountains, the Turkish troops lost in snow and -30*C temperature, were delayed at passes by Armenian volunteers, which enabled Russians to regroup and came back to the front. Records say that a 90.000 soldier’s army was wiped away in less than ten days, because of poor gear, lack of food, disease, frozen like statues in the open air or caves. Why don’t they mention the greatest loss in military history of Turks just because Armenians who knew the terrain well, fought and stopped the Turkish troops in ice covered mountain passes?

In February 1915 Armenians in Van revolted, in April the city fell to them. We have books and photos by Armenian heroes. It was evident that allies were to land at Gallipoli and Armenian troops engaged Turkish troops in the rear when they were needed up front. German commanders asked that all front lines be cleared of all living people and animals hindering activities. The normal reaction (see some documentary films of British and Americans) would have been firing and killing immediately on spot or push towards the front to be wiped off between two fires and war deprivations.

The relocation of Armenians in Anatolia (those in the Western cities, families of those working for the State were excluded) started in mid June 1915. In late August Catholics and Protestants as well were excluded and those who were relocated were permitted to return. Certainly there was insufficiency of everything, food, guards, medicine… But transfer camps were set up to feed and rest the columns but nevertheless some acts of banditry happened on some columns which could not be protected when crossing Kurdish villages that had a grudge of revenge for atrocities committed by Armenian bands and revolutionaries.

Well, it is this incident which is claimed to be genocide. Records show that only ten percent of the people which were relocated (estimated 600 to 700.000) died in transit, epidemics, and hardships etc. 42 Gendarmes died trying to protect their groups. To prove that there was never any genocide (no intention, or place, no time, no graves, no time, and no written evidence, not even neutral eye witnesses) let us submit our written evidence that no act which may be called massacre or genocide ever happened.

*Copy of “Note Verbal” by Secretary-General Sir Eric Drummond, dated March 1st, 1920.
League of Nations, Sunderland House, Curzon Street, London, SW.1 20/4/34 Doc. ?41/2422/607
Page 2: “Further, in Turkey, minorities were often oppressed and massacres carried out by irregular bands who were entirely outside the control of the central Turkish Government.

Now, let us see what the Associated Press correspondent George Abel Schreiner, who sent the bitter letter dated December 11, 1918 to Ambassador Morgenthau, and which was found by Professor Heath Lowry, now with us, wrote in his later book “From Berlin to Bagdad”. May I express my thanks to Prof. Lowry for being the discoverer in 1990s, of this letter which exposed Morgenthaus duplicities for the first time. Morgenthau’s Diary was known at that time, but it has only been made public by Gomidas Institute in London in the recent years which enabled me to make this “hair counting comparison”.

Mr. Lowry, is free to say a few words now for this book, which owes much to him. (*)

P. 10: -Made some inquiries relative to massacres alleged to have happened in Pera. Everybody smiled. Then they told me the name of the American correspondent who had disseminated these rumors from Salonica and Athens in the form of “honest-to-goodness news dispatches. Also the he fact was mentioned that since then the Ottoman government had been rather severe toward all foreign news-paper-men. As to the massacres – there has been no such thing, of course.-

Those who surf posting No. 3099, on the “armenians” blog site, can see with their own eyes the speech of the General Secretary Fridhjof Nansen and printed in the League of Nations Official Gazette relative to the meeting held on September 21, 1929, in which this highest authority confirms that the western powers promised to give Armenians a national home, if they were to fight for them! They fought, 200.000 of them died in several fights but that the promises were never kept. Gentlemen, what better and stronger evidence can be ever produced by anyone to refute this international declaration? Those who would refer to page 105 of my second book can see the full text of the report dated August 1919 by Captain Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, in which they clearly confirm that it was the Armenians who killed Moslems, raped and murdered Moslems. This one was discovered by Prof. Justin McCarthy. It is all there gentlemen in the official U.S. state records, waiting to be picked up and noticed.

Now, let me add a few remarks about, Geoffrey Robertson, Q.C. which means that he is Consul of the Queen, a great reputation. Mr. Robertson wrote a book on the Armenian affair, trying to pass a resolution through the British Parliament, which failed because the Government said that there was no “international legal verdict” on this matter. When we read the book, we learn that he was given this job by a member of the Oil billionaires the Gulbenkian family in London. He was so careless that he did not even made use of the “Gomidas Institute” material, which published the Morgenthau Diary. Ara Sarafian the director of Gomidas has been in the Ottoman archives speaks Turkish and he frequently visits Turkey on errands to publicize genocide. Q.C. Robertson made a series of mistakes, because he read what was given to him and had no idea about other sources which would scrap everything he wrote ambitiously, in seconds. He speaks that the matter now is for judges. But in doing so he is not even aware of the European Court of Justice Verdict No. T-346/03, dated 17.12.2003 and refusing a court case opened by an Armenian Family which depended on a decision of the European Parliament. He is neither aware of the 60th Genocide Convention in Rome and that a special rapporteur has been assigned to the General Secretary in 2004 (?) to deal with genocide claims which must depend on authorized international court’s decision, under several restrictions. Mr. Robertson is a much reputed lawyer, but he poke his well paid hand in a subject he never knew anything about it. It is not any matter of “legal scholars”, it is matter of International Authorized Court, where no one has the courage to apply and lose.

Let me add a few remarks on the famous Hitler quote, which is known to be fake and rejected by the Nuremberg Court. Any one that will refer to my second book Chapters 13, 14/1 and 14/2 will find comprehensive pictures and data, showing the paper supposed to be the Hitler speech. This is a book named “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich” by William A. Shirer, dated 1959, about 1600 pages. Here you have details of Nuremberg court, who said what, which documents were found and used, from military to all political contacts. Sir, if you do not research even this much, please do not shade the title given to you. Again in my second book there is about 60 or more pages, some excerpted from Sam Weem’s book, “Secrets of a Christian Terrorist State Armenia”. You are given plenty photos, picture of the Dashnakist Hayastan newspaper dated February 1945, praising Hitler and victory.

Gentlemen, we have irrefutable several evidences of the Armenians in the Nazi Army under General butcher Dro, Drastamat Kanajan who did most of the killings in the Caucasus together with General Antranik. They had 22.000 soldiers, special Armenian Legion with tags, medals and everything. 4.800 were special S.S. troops. Jewish people are so naïve that they believe in a lie but cannot read their own historians, such as Stamford Shaw, may be teacher of our friend Professor Lowry here, who certainly knows everything better than me. General Dro, which was searched by Russians, was accepted in USA and so the 22.000 soldiers who suddenly became “D.P.” displaced persons, war victims, and they too were nearly all accepted to USA against a quota of only 2.000 persons. How? It is all written in this book again from Armenian writer, Arthur Derunian who went to Berlin in 1949 and saw the black market operated by the Dashnakist Armenian ex-soldiers. I have given all details, even the money each had to pay to obtain affidavits to enter USA. Dashnaks do nothing for free. Money is the blood of the whole system, including today’s claims. The “Armenian Terror and Genocide claims” were produced after 1960s, when all gang leaders were accepted into USA, but had o invent an industry to “collect money for training in the Bekaa Valley” etc..

This book has been in the internet since 2008, anyone can download and take PDF prints, I still have a few copies left of this first book. It has over 2000 verbatim excerpts, which has been picked up may be from 20.000 pages reading and surfing. You may see it in many Embassies, but who ever opens the cover and looks in the contents or sources? So, I am wrong for counting the hairs in a research and find facts, and those who do not read much and do not care to learn or defend truth, they have the position and power. So, lies win over truth. Lies are paid well; truths, never!

I urge you to watch the DVD gifted by Melih Berk as “diş kirası”. It has many videos, speeches of Tayyip Erdogan in 2005 in Munich silencing everyone, words of Artin Penik who set himself on fire protesting the Esenboga attack of Armenians, and many others. But my favorite documentary is the one about the Galipoli War, with the beautiful ballad “Waltzing Mathilda”. In this documentary you see how youngsters are deceived to become heroes, and how sad they return home crippled stage that they no long can sing Waltzing Mathilda and that the ones who bid farewell to them going to war, this time turned their heads and do not want to see…

Yes, you will see Armenian children aged 10-11 being taught in camps or schools how to kill Turks. Will you all surrender to these bandits of human ethics and killers?

So far I did not, and fought against the windmills alone. I may not win, thanks to so much indifference by people who should be the ones concerned but at least I will be remembered in which side of the fence I stood. Thank you all for coming, thank you Pat, so many of you filling this room with your feelings.



Comment by Ferruh Demirmen

Ambassador Henry Morgenthau was the U.S. envoy to Ottoman Turkey during November 1913-February 1916. His book, Ambassador Morgenthau's Story, written in 1918 and based on his personal diaries, has been used by Armenian propagandists as the main source of “Armenian genocide” allegations. Because of his diplomatic post, Morgenthau’s book had an aura of credibility with the American public and greatly shaped the public perception of the Turco-Armenian conflict. To this day this perception continues almost unabated, with Morgenthau’s book cited as a prima facie evidence for Armenian claims. The book was ghostwritten by Mr. Burton J. Hendrick, a Pulitzer Prize winner, at substantial financial gain.

But Morgenthau, a key player in President Woodrow Wilson’s 1912 election campaign and rewarded with a plum diplomatic appointment in return, was unconscionably bigoted and untruthful in his book. His book is infused with blatant racism against Turks, and his claims of premeditated massacre of Armenians by the Ottoman government were outright lies. During his 26 months of service as an ambassador to Ottoman Turkey, he barely set foot outside Istanbul, and he relied on his two Armenian secretaries (whom he had brought from the U.S.) as the source of alleged Turkish atrocities in the eastern territories. His motive for demonizing and vilifying Turks (and to some extent the Germans) was to induce the U.S. to enter the war on the side of the Allied Powers – an aim apparently supported by President Wilson.

Mr. Sukru Server Aya deserves much praise for writing the book, Preposterous Paradoxes of Ambassador Morgenthau: A Factual Story About Politics, Propaganda and Distortions. This is Mr. Aya’s third book on the Armenian question. The book follows Prof. Heath W. Lowry’s seminal work, The Story Behind Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story, published in 1990, revealing the untrustworthiness of Morgenthau’s book. Mr. Aya’s book, comparing meticulously Morgenthau’s personal diaries with his subsequent book, further exposes the duplicity, dishonesty and unreliability of the ambassador’s book. The comparison brings new perspectives as to why Ambassador Morgenthau's Story was a wartime propaganda tool lacking objectivity. Mr. Aya also explains in his book how the Armenians were duped and promised their own land if they fought alongside the allies, but ended empty-handed afterwards.

The true, self-serving character of Morgenthau’s book should be disseminated widely, and Mr. Aya’s book is a valuable contribution toward that end.

Apart from his books, Mr. Aya has given conferences and authored some 370 articles on the Armenian question since 2005. It is remarkable that he does his research at great personal sacrifice. As he stated during the inauguration of his latest book in Istanbul on March 30, 2013, he is a friend of Armenians, and holds no personal hostility toward any ethnic or religious group. But he stands for truth and justice, and that is what motivates him to write and expose. Contrast that with the racist mindset of the likes of Peter Balakian from the “genocide” camp.

F. Demirmen
April 7, 2013






Direct Link To The Document



The following article has been written by Mr. Melih Aṣık, an opinion editor of the Turkish Daily “Milliyet” on April 14th, 2013


Direct Link


Book Review : Preposterous Paradoxes: Ambassador Morgenthau

Preposterous Paradoxes: Ambassador Morgenthau …the title of Sukru Server Aya’s latest book could not be more appropriate in lieu of the information presented in a “reader friendly” format. Thankfully not an academic treatise, Mr. Aya thoroughly documents the many discrepancies in the ongoing saga that the media labels the Armenian Genocide. Using archival documents from the era, Ambassador Morgenthau’s book as well as his diary, and previously published works of other authors, Aya’s book presents information which has been in the public domain for years but ignored by the majority of historians.

Part I, comprising the majority of the book, juxtaposes Ambassador Morgenthau’s published and public views with those in his diary and the blatant inconsistencies are shocking, challenging a belief that has permeated western thought for 100 years and counting. It is impossible to read this section and not doubt the commonly accepted mantra still touted.

Parts 2-5, presented in the same format, expose the deception and manipulation used by the media, government officials, and philanthropists of that era to achieve their various goals and support their own agendas. Part 3 raises the issue of “numbers”….how many Armenians were killed and this is where archival documents are important. There are so many different numbers given by various sources that one has to either pick a side to believe or decide to believe neither side. Since all the sources of the day had an agenda, even those who claimed to be neutral, and the number of dead varied from source to source, one wonders if the exact count, which is impossible to determine, is important. There are more significant issues presented that ought to have a greater impact: the speech that Hitler supposedly said about the Armenians was considered to be fabricated by the Nuremberg Tribunal who would not accept it as evidence; do the events fit the definition of genocide.

A familiar phrase often used in academia is: Statistics never lie but statisticians do! While challenging the credibility of Ambassador Morgenthau and debunking the myth of genocide, Mr. Aya exposes the vast differences in sources that purport to hold the truth. There are many lessons to be learned from this book, the impact of which goes beyond the topic by challenging our beliefs. If one “truth” can be doubted, so can many others. In this technological age when information comes at us fast and furiously via the internet, it behooves us to become more critical in our thinking knowing that there is more than one side to a story. Popular wisdom may not be so wise.

Ellen Reisman
Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA

7 June 2013

.
Read More
Posted in Sukru AYA, Videos | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • 3155) FBI Busts Armenian Mafia For The Largest US Medicare Fraud, Identity Theft & Bank Fraud
    March 26, 2012 Update Armenian Power Organized Crime Group Convicted For One Of The Largest Identity Theft And Bank Fraud Schemes Armenian...
  • 3054) Pursuing The Just Cause Of Their People A Study Of Contemporary Armenian Terrorism by Michael M.Gunter
    Pursuing The Just Cause Of Their People A Study Of Contemporary Armenian Terrorism by Michael M.Gunter West Would Not Support Armenian Po...
  • 3348) ASALA: We All Believed In One Idea: Party
    ASALA: We All Believed In One Idea: Party Interview with "The interlocutor of Armenia," Commander Group "Yeghia Keshishian...
  • 2925) Opinions: Kassesian, Sassounian, Aramyan, Novosti, Aramyan, Jabarian, Badalyan, Eckian, Bayramoglu, Toranian, Gürsel . .
    Young Turks: Who Were The Authors of Our Genocide?, Ioasif Kassesian , From His book: Nemesis Are Armenia’s Policies Making Turkey Stron...
  • 3026) Human Rights Report: Turkey & Armenia (US Department of State March 2010 Release)
    2009 Human Rights Report: Turkey Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor 2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices Marc...
  • 3267) Ara Papian: Woodrow Wilson’s Arbitral Award Is A Valid And Legally Obligatory Document
    Indefatigable analyst of international legal and historical contexts of occupation by the Turks in Armenia, the former Armenian diplomat ...
  • 3290) After All, Who Remembers The Armenian Victims Of The Armenian Terrorism?
    Maxime Gauin 30 June 2011 One of the most clear evidence that the Armenian nationalist parties have no right to present themselves as prom...
  • 3344) Armenian-Speaking Muslims Of Hamshen in Turkey: Who Are They?
    By Vahan Ishkhanyan / © 2012 Hetq online “I feel uncomfortable conversing through a translator. We can speak that language fairly well, but...
  • 3405) My Soul Dear Agop, . .
    After serving the University of Istanbul, Cerrahpasha Faculty of Medicine for 41 years, Prof. Dr. Agop Koto?yan, otherwise also known as...
  • 3030) SlideShow: Armenian Legion In Nazi Germany
    Related Link: Nazi-Armenians Helped Hitler Exterminate Jews . . 12 Images Kindly Provided by TruckT...

Categories

  • 1 (19)
  • Adolf HITLER (2)
  • Alfred De Zayas (3)
  • Ambassador Morgenthau (3)
  • ANCA (4)
  • Andranik Pasha (1)
  • Andrew Mango (3)
  • Ara BALIOZIAN (12)
  • Ara Papian (7)
  • Ara SARAFIAN (2)
  • Aram Andonian (1)
  • ARF (21)
  • Armen GARO (6)
  • Armenian TERROR (24)
  • Arthur Sutherland (4)
  • ASALA (5)
  • Ata ATUN (1)
  • AUSTRALIA (6)
  • Berch Keresteciyan (1)
  • Boghos Nubar Pasha (1)
  • Book REVIEW (21)
  • C F Dixon-Johnson (1)
  • CANADA (1)
  • Captain Emory Niles (3)
  • Court Cases (10)
  • David Holthouse (2)
  • David Saltzman (5)
  • Dennis R PAPAZIAN (1)
  • Dogu Ergil (1)
  • Edward ERICKSON (4)
  • Erciyes University (1)
  • Ergun KIRLIKOVALI (17)
  • Erman SAHIN (1)
  • France (5)
  • Free E-Books (54)
  • Free E-Books And Docs (2)
  • Fridthjof Nansen (1)
  • Fuat Dundar (5)
  • General Harbord (1)
  • Guenter LEWY (2)
  • Gunay Evinch (4)
  • Gwynne DYER (1)
  • Hampig Sassounian (8)
  • Harut SASSOUNIAN (32)
  • Henry Morgenthau (1)
  • Hetq.am (28)
  • Holdwater (2)
  • Hrant DINK (5)
  • Innocent(?) Armenians (24)
  • James Bryce (2)
  • Jeremy Salt (6)
  • Justin McCarthy (11)
  • Kamer KASIM (1)
  • Karabakh (1)
  • Kemal Cicek (2)
  • Khatchig Mouradian (11)
  • Khojaly (1)
  • League of Nations (13)
  • Limited Book Preview (2)
  • Lobbying (1)
  • Louise NALBANDIAN (2)
  • Maxime GAUIN (31)
  • Media SCANNER (4)
  • Mehmet PERINCEK (1)
  • Michael GUNTER (5)
  • Mumtaz SOYSAL (2)
  • Murad Topalian (4)
  • Noam Chomsky (1)
  • Norman STONE (3)
  • O E LUTEM (6)
  • Pasdermadjian (1)
  • Peter Balakian (2)
  • Pierre Loti (2)
  • Rafael De Nogales (1)
  • Research PAPERS (76)
  • Robert Fisk (8)
  • Ruben Safrastyan (1)
  • S (41)
  • Sadi DINLENC (2)
  • Sedat LACINER (1)
  • SlideShows (5)
  • Southern Poverty Law Center (2)
  • Sukru AYA (150)
  • Taner AKCAM (11)
  • Turkkkaya ATAOV (4)
  • Vahakn DADRIAN (1)
  • Vahe AVETIAN (4)
  • Vercihan Zifliyan (3)
  • Videos (43)
  • William Saroyan (2)
  • Woodrow Wilson (2)
  • Yucel GUCLU (2)
  • Yuksel OKTAY (1)
  • Yusuf Halacoglu (1)
  • Zoryan Institute (4)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (29)
    • ▼  September (1)
      • Would You Like To Login To This Site & Publish Yo...
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2012 (49)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (139)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2010 (208)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (32)
    • ►  April (28)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2009 (75)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (23)
    • ►  August (27)
    • ►  July (3)
Powered by Blogger.